Science of Reading Act of 2026

SI-generated grade · five published checks · not individually reviewed by a person · methodology

The Science of Reading Act of 2026 is a conditional federal grant program that falls within Congress's spending power under Article I, Section 8, Clause 1. It does not directly mandate curriculum or prohibit any instructional method; rather, it conditions the receipt of federal funds on alignment with the science of reading. While the bill's definition of 'science of reading' and its exclusion of the three-cueing model may raise concerns about federal influence over state and local educational decisions, the conditional nature of the grant and the absence of a direct mandate keep it within constitutional bounds. The bill does not infringe on individual rights, and it does not bypass due process or take property. However, the federal government's role in education is not an enumerated power, and the bill's prescriptive definition may push the boundaries of federal influence, warranting a grade of B rather than A.

• ✓ Passes · Enumerated powers
  Congress has the power to tax and spend for the general welfare under Article I, Section 8, Clause 1. The bill operates through the existing CLSD grant program, which is a conditional spending program. The Supreme Court has upheld the use of the spending power to attach conditions to federal grants, provided the conditions are clear and related to the federal interest in the program. Here, the con…
• ✓ Passes · Bill of Rights
  The bill does not directly infringe on any of the first ten amendments. It does not restrict speech, religion, assembly, press, or petition. It does not affect the right to bear arms, quartering of soldiers, search and seizure, self-incrimination, due process, trial rights, or cruel and unusual punishment. The bill's definition of 'science of reading' and its exclusion of the three-cueing model do…
• ✓ Passes · Individual sovereignty
  The bill does not restrict what individuals can do with their own person, property, speech, labor, or belief. It does not impose any direct regulation on individuals. It affects state and local educational agencies that choose to accept federal funds. The bill does not compel any individual to adopt a particular teaching method; it only affects the allocation of federal funds. The burden is on the…
• ✗ Concern · Decentralization
  The bill fails the decentralization test because it consolidates decision-making at the federal level regarding the definition of 'science of reading' and the exclusion of the three-cueing model. While the grant program is voluntary, the federal government is using its spending power to influence state and local educational decisions. The questions: (1) Could an individual or family handle this wi…
• ✓ Passes · Due process and takings
  The bill does not bypass due process or take property without just compensation. It does not impose any penalty or deprivation on individuals or entities. The bill merely conditions the receipt of federal funds on compliance with certain requirements. There is no deprivation of life, liberty, or property without due process. The bill does not involve any taking of private property for public use. …

Sources: Congress.gov: HR 7890 summary

Reading Results and State Control Literacy Grants Act

Generated by VFA SI Solutions

Help more children become strong readers by focusing federal literacy funds on reading instruction backed by research on phonics, vocabulary, fluency, comprehension, and writing.

Bipartisan rationale: VFA assesses this draft honors Republican priorities for fiscal restraint, state control of schools, and evidence-based use of federal funds by barring federal support for a discredited method and capping costs with a sunset. VFA assesses it honors Democratic priorities for early literacy equity, teacher training, and support for struggling readers by keeping competitive funds focused on proven reading instruction for high-need districts and early childhood programs.

Possible legislative path: House and Senate support may come from members focused on early reading results and teacher support, while opposition may come from members wary of federal limits on curriculum or from members seeking larger or permanent funding.

Source limits: The full bill text and current law were not part of the official summary reviewed, so detailed eligibility rules, existing appeal rights, current funding levels, cost effects, and conflicts with state law remain unverified; proposed review and appeal steps described here are new safeguards and readers should verify the official record at Congress.gov before relying on funding or rights claims.

Brief for congressional offices →