H.R. 776 explained · 119th Congress · Pending in Congress
Nutria Eradication and Control Reauthorization Act of 2025
Cosponsors: 3 (2 D, 1 R) · per Congress.gov, 2026-10-12
Introduced: 2025-01-28
Latest action (2025-02-05): Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.
What H.R. 776 does, in plain terms
Nutria Eradication and Control Reauthorization Act of 2025 This bill reauthorizes through FY2030 the Nutria Eradication and Control Act of 2003, which allows the Department of the Interior to provide financial assistance to states for (1) eradicating or controlling nutria, and (2) restoring marshland damaged by nutria. Nutria are invasive, semi-aquatic rodents.
Official summary by the Congressional Research Service, via Congress.gov.
Constitution Index
“VFA Constitution grade”
Minor constitutional concerns
Graded 2026-10-10
SI-generated grade · five published checks · not individually reviewed by a person · methodology
The bill reauthorizes a federal program providing financial assistance to states for nutria eradication and marshland restoration. It operates within the federal spending power and cooperative federalism framework, with no infringement on individual rights. However, it raises minor federalism concerns by incentivizing state action in an area traditionally reserved to the states, though the voluntary nature of the assistance mitigates the issue.
-
✓ Passes · Enumerated powers
The federal government's authority to spend for the general welfare under Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 supports providing financial assistance to states for environmental and agricultural purposes. The bill does not mandate state action but offers voluntary grants, which is a valid exercise of the spending power. The regulation of invasive species affecting interstate commerce and federal lands … -
✓ Passes · Bill of Rights
The bill does not implicate any of the first ten amendments. It imposes no restrictions on speech, religion, assembly, press, petition, arms, quartering, search and seizure, self-incrimination, due process, trial rights, or cruel and unusual punishment. It is a purely programmatic funding measure. -
✓ Passes · Individual sovereignty
The bill does not restrict individual liberty. It provides funding to states for environmental management and does not compel any private person to act or refrain from acting. The burden of proof for any restriction is not triggered because no restriction exists. -
✗ Concern · Decentralization
The bill fails the decentralization test because it consolidates decision-making at the federal level for a matter that states and local communities can handle. However, the federal role is limited to providing financial assistance, and states retain discretion over implementation. The Tenth Amendment is not directly violated because the program is voluntary and does not commandeer state resources… -
✓ Passes · Due process and takings
The bill does not deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process, nor does it take private property for public use without just compensation. It is a funding authorization with no regulatory or enforcement mechanisms that would trigger the Fifth Amendment.
Sources: Congress.gov: HR 776 summary
Report an error in this grade
What should pass
“VFA SI Solution”
No solution yet
A sourced SI draft appears here once it passes automated checks (Constitution citation, source verification, independent SI critic). How publication works.
Related on VFA
For journalists and bloggers
“Embed this grade”
Free to use with the link back. The badge and card update when the grade changes. Embed terms →