H.R. 6893 explained · 119th Congress · Pending in Congress
Chesapeake Bay Watershed Advancement for Training, Education, Restoration, and Science (WATERS) Act
Cosponsors: 7 (5 D, 2 R) · per Congress.gov, 2026-10-14
Introduced: 2025-12-18
Latest action (2026-09-15): Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation.
What H.R. 6893 does, in plain terms
Chesapeake Bay Watershed Advancement for Training, Education, Restoration, and Science (WATERS) Act This bill reauthorizes the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration's Chesapeake Bay Office and modifies requirements concerning the office and its activities, such as new consultation requirements. (The office partners with the Chesapeake Bay Program to improve the health of the Chesapeake Bay.) The bill also provides statutory authority for the office's Chesapeake Bay watershed education and training program for elementary and secondary schools. Further, the bill authorizes the office to establish a program to support coordinated management, protection, characterization, and restoration of priority Chesapeake Bay habitats and living resources.
Official summary by the Congressional Research Service, via Congress.gov.
Constitution Index
“VFA Constitution grade”
Not graded yet
H.R. 6893 has not been graded yet. New measures with an official summary are graded daily under the published rubric.
The Framers
“Founders’ Verdict”
Confidence 0.75
Archived SI output (machine-generated)No editorial review recorded. This historical SI verdict was machine-generated by software and predates the review desk; check it against the official bill text.
Synthesis
The Act is constitutional only if it is narrowly tailored to address interstate commerce effects in the Chesapeake Bay watershed, avoids coercing states or regulating purely local land use and water rights, and ensures federal spending serves the general welfare without intruding on state sovereignty reserved by the Tenth Amendment.
The proposed Act, which authorizes federal expenditures and programs for environmental restoration in the Chesapeake Bay watershed, must be examined under the enumerated powers of Congress. The Constitution grants Congress authority to regulate interstate commerce (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3) and to provide for the general welfare through spending (Article I, Section 8, Clause 1), but only for purposes that are national in scope and not merely local. The Chesapeake Bay is an interstate waterway, and its restoration directly affects navigation, fisheries, and commerce among several states, …
The Chesapeake Bay WATERS Act proposes federal action in environmental protection, education, and restoration within a watershed. The Constitution grants the federal government only enumerated powers, and environmental regulation is not among them. The Tenth Amendment reserves all powers not delegated to the United States to the states or the people. Furthermore, the Ninth Amendment cautions that the enumeration of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people, including the right of local self-governance. Without a clear connection to interstate comm…
The Chesapeake Bay watershed spans multiple states, and its preservation involves interdependencies that no single state can effectively manage alone. Under the Commerce Clause, Congress may regulate activities that substantially affect interstate commerce, and pollution or degradation of a shared interstate water body clearly falls within that sphere. However, to remain within the bounds of enumerated powers, this legislation must be carefully tailored to address only those aspects of the watershed that directly involve interstate commerce or navigable waters, and not intrude upon the reserve…
The Chesapeake Bay Watershed WATERS Act is a constitutional exercise of Congress's power under the Commerce Clause and the Necessary and Proper Clause. The Chesapeake Bay watershed spans multiple states, and its pollution and restoration directly affect interstate commerce. In Gibbons v. Ogden (1824), this Court held that Congress may regulate all commerce which concerns more states than one, and that such regulation includes the waters and channels of commerce. The Act's provisions for training, education, restoration, and science are plainly adapted to the legitimate end of protecting and im…
Report an error in this Founders' Verdict
What should pass
“VFA SI Solution”
No solution yet
A sourced SI draft appears here once it passes automated checks (Constitution citation, source verification, independent SI critic). How publication works.
Related on VFA
For journalists and bloggers
“Embed this grade”
Free to use with the link back. The badge and card update when the grade changes. Embed terms →