H.R. 3657 explained  ·  119th Congress  ·  Became law

Hydropower Licensing Transparency Act

Create a free account or sign in to follow H.R. 3657 and get alerts. Policy area: Energy Create a free account or sign in to follow the Energy policy area and get alerts. ▲ 24 days since action Sponsor: Kim Schrier, WA-08, D → Congress.gov

Cosponsors: 3 (1 D, 2 R) · per Congress.gov, 2026-10-14

Introduced: 2025-05-29

Latest action (2026-09-25): Became Public Law No: 119-112.

What H.R. 3657 does, in plain terms

Hydropower Relicensing Transparency Act This bill directs the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission to report annually to Congress on the status of the relicensing process for each application for a renewed hydropower dam license.

Official summary by the Congressional Research Service, via Congress.gov.

Constitution Index

“VFA Constitution grade”

A

Constitutionally sound

Graded 2026-10-11

SI-generated grade · five published checks · not individually reviewed by a person · methodology

The Hydropower Licensing Transparency Act is a straightforward reporting requirement that directs FERC to provide annual updates to Congress on hydropower relicensing applications. It does not expand federal regulatory authority, restrict individual rights, or consolidate power. The action falls squarely within Congress's enumerated power to regulate interstate commerce and oversee federal agencies, and it enhances transparency and accountability without imposing new burdens on citizens or states.

  • ✓ Passes · Enumerated powers
    Congress has the authority to direct federal agencies to report on their activities under its Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 (Commerce Clause) power, as hydropower licensing affects interstate commerce and navigable waters. Additionally, Congress's oversight power over federal agencies is inherent in its legislative authority. The bill does not create new regulatory authority but merely requires r…
  • ✓ Passes · Bill of Rights
    The bill imposes no restrictions on speech, religion, assembly, press, petition, arms, quartering, search and seizure, self-incrimination, due process, takings, trial by jury, or cruel and unusual punishment. It is a purely administrative reporting requirement that does not affect any individual rights protected by the Bill of Rights.
  • ✓ Passes · Individual sovereignty
    The bill does not restrict any individual's use of their person, property, speech, labor, or belief. It imposes no new obligations on private citizens or businesses. It merely requires a federal agency to report to Congress, which does not infringe on individual sovereignty.
  • ✓ Passes · Decentralization
    The bill does not consolidate decision-making at a higher level of government. It is a transparency measure that keeps existing federal authority intact while providing information to Congress. It does not prevent individuals, local communities, or states from handling their own affairs; it simply adds an oversight mechanism for an already federal process.
  • ✓ Passes · Due process and takings
    The bill does not affect due process rights or the Takings Clause. It does not deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process, nor does it take private property for public use without just compensation. It is a reporting requirement that does not alter any existing procedural or substantive rights.

Sources: Congress.gov: HR 3657 summary

Report an error in this grade
No account needed. Or email hello@valuesforamerica.com. How reports are handled.

What should pass

“VFA SI Solution”

No solution yet

A sourced SI draft appears here once it passes automated checks (Constitution citation, source verification, independent SI critic). How publication works.

Share card

1200×675 PNG for X, Threads, LinkedIn and messages. Free to share with a link back to this page.

For journalists and bloggers

“Embed this grade”

Free to use with the link back. The badge and card update when the grade changes. Embed terms →

VFA Constitution grade for H.R. 3657

← Back to the Republic