Real bill currently in Congress  c/o  HR/119/2715

Destruction of Hazardous Imports Act

Policy area: Health ▲ 45 days since action Sponsor: Clay Higgins, LA-03, R → Congress.gov

Latest action (2026-07-21): Received in the Senate and Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.

Official summary

Destruction of Hazardous Imports Act This bill expands the Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA’s) authority to require the destruction of certain items that are refused import into the United States and pose a risk to public health. Under current law, imported food, drugs, medical devices, tobacco products, and cosmetics are subject to FDA review. If an imported item is deficient in a specified manner (e.g., counterfeit, misbranded, or manufactured under insanitary conditions), the item is generally refused admission to the United States. An item refused admission may generally be exported, except that the FDA may destroy a drug, medical device, or tobacco product that is valued under $2,500 without the opportunity for export. Under the bill, the FDA may order the destruction, without the opportunity for export, of any food, drug, medical device, tobacco product, or cosmetic that is refused admission if the item presents a significant public health concern. If such an order is issued, the item’s owner or consignee must destroy it within 90 days at their own cost. The bill also prohibits the unauthorized movement (e.g., export) of an item subject to a destruction order. A violator is subject to a fine, a prison term of up to one year, or both. The FDA must promulgate regulations to carry out these provisions. These regulations must provide for due process for the owner or consignee of an item subject to a destruction order, including notice and an opportunity to appear before the item is destroyed.

The Framers

“Founders’ Verdict”

CONSTITUTIONAL

Confidence 0.75

Synthesis

The Destruction of Hazardous Imports Act is a constitutional exercise of Congress's power to regulate foreign commerce under Article I, Section 8, Clause 3. The power to exclude and destroy hazardous imported goods is inherent in the commerce power, and the bill's provision for notice and an opportunity to be heard satisfies the Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause. The destruction of refused items does not constitute a taking requiring compensation because the items are not lawfully admitted into the United States. The criminal penalties and prohibition on unauthorized movement are necessary and proper to effectuate the destruction orders, consistent with the Necessary and Proper Clause and the broad federal authority over foreign commerce recognized in Federalist Nos. 23 and 45 and Gibbons v. Ogden.

Hamilton YES

The Destruction of Hazardous Imports Act is a constitutional exercise of Congress's power to regulate foreign commerce under Article I, Section 8, Clause 3. The federal government possesses plenary authority over imports, including the power to exclude or destroy goods that pose a significant public health risk. As argued in Federalist No. 23, the national government must be vested with all powers necessary for the common defense and general welfare, which includes protecting the public from hazardous imported articles. The bill's provision for due process through notice and an opportunity to …

Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 Federalist No. 23
Jefferson CONDITIONAL

The Congress possesses authority under the Commerce Clause to regulate imported articles that threaten public health. However, the power to destroy private property without compensation and with only administrative due process raises grave concerns under the Fifth Amendment, which prohibits the taking of property for public use without just compensation and guarantees due process of law. The Tenth Amendment further reminds us that powers not delegated to the United States are reserved to the states or the people. As written, the bill authorizes the destruction of property without any provision…

Amendment V Amendment X Article I, Section 8, Clause 3
Madison YES

The proposed bill is a valid exercise of Congress's power to regulate commerce with foreign nations, as it addresses the destruction of imported items that have been refused admission and pose a public health risk. This authority is grounded in the Commerce Clause, which empowers Congress to control the terms of importation, including the disposition of goods that fail to meet lawful standards. The bill's provision for due process, including notice and an opportunity to be heard, satisfies the Fifth Amendment's requirement that no person be deprived of property without due process of law. The …

Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 Federalist No. 45
Marshall YES

The Destruction of Hazardous Imports Act is a constitutional exercise of the power of Congress to regulate commerce with foreign nations, as vested by Article I, Section 8, Clause 3. The act authorizes the destruction of imported items that are refused admission and pose a significant public health risk. This power is inherent in the authority to exclude and control the entry of goods, as the power to regulate commerce includes the power to prohibit the introduction of harmful articles. The provision for due process, including notice and an opportunity to appear before destruction, satisfies t…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 (Commerce Clause) Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 U.S. 1 (1824) (broad federal power over commerce, including the power to exclude and regulate imports)

What should pass

“AI Consensus Solution”

No solution yet

Daily synthesis runs at 06:00 UTC. This bill's consensus draft will appear on the next pass.

← Back to the Republic