H.R. 2400 explained  ·  119th Congress  ·  Passed the Senate

Pit River Land Transfer Act of 2026

Create a free account or sign in to follow H.R. 2400 and get alerts. Policy area: Native Americans Create a free account or sign in to follow the Native Americans policy area and get alerts. ▲ 19 days since action Sponsor: Doug LaMalfa, CA-01, R → Congress.gov

Cosponsors: none · per Congress.gov, 2026-10-17

Introduced: 2025-03-27

Latest action (2026-09-30): Passed Senate with an amendment by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S5297-5298)

What H.R. 2400 does, in plain terms

Pit River Land Transfer Act of 2025 This bill takes approximately 603.94 acres of specified lands in California into trust for the benefit of the Pit River Tribe. Specifically, the bill directs the Department of the Interior to take the following lands into trust for the benefit of the tribe: (1) approximately 583.79 acres of federal land managed by the Forest Service (but excluding approximately 20.03 acres of roads, highways, and public rights-of-way subject to existing easements), and (2) approximately 40.18 acres of fee land held by the tribe. These combined lands, approximately 603.94 acres, shall be part of the tribe's reservation. Further, the bill prohibits gaming on the land taken into trust.

Official summary by the Congressional Research Service, via Congress.gov.

Constitution Index

“VFA Constitution grade”

A

Constitutionally sound

Graded 2026-10-11

SI-generated grade · five published checks · not individually reviewed by a person · methodology

The Pit River Land Transfer Act of 2026 is a straightforward land-into-trust measure that falls squarely within Congress's plenary authority over Indian affairs and federal public lands. It does not infringe any constitutional right, does not restrict individual sovereignty, and does not consolidate power upward beyond the necessary federal role in managing federal lands and fulfilling treaty obligations. The prohibition on gaming is a permissible exercise of Congress's authority and does not raise constitutional concerns.

  • ✓ Passes · Enumerated powers
    Congress has explicit constitutional authority over Indian affairs and federal property. Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 (Indian Commerce Clause) grants Congress power to regulate commerce with Indian tribes, and Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2 (Property Clause) grants Congress power to dispose of and make rules respecting federal territory and property. Taking federal land into trust for a tribe i…
  • ✓ Passes · Bill of Rights
    The bill does not implicate any provision of the Bill of Rights. It does not restrict speech, religion, assembly, press, petition, arms, quartering, search and seizure, self-incrimination, due process, takings, trial rights, or cruel and unusual punishment. The land transfer is a property disposition, not a government action against individuals.
  • ✓ Passes · Individual sovereignty
    The bill does not restrict any individual's use of their person, property, speech, labor, or belief. It transfers land to a tribal government for the benefit of the tribe, and the prohibition on gaming is a restriction on the tribe's use of the land, not on individual liberties. The tribe voluntarily accepts the trust status and the gaming restriction as part of the transfer.
  • ✓ Passes · Decentralization
    The action is a federal land transfer, which inherently requires federal involvement because the land is federally owned. The decision to take land into trust for a tribe is a matter of federal Indian policy, which is constitutionally committed to the federal government. The bill does not consolidate decision-making at a higher level than necessary; it simply executes a federal responsibility. The…
  • ✓ Passes · Due process and takings
    The bill does not take private property without just compensation. The land in question is either federal land or fee land already held by the tribe. The tribe consents to the trust status, and the federal land is being transferred to trust, not taken from a private owner. There is no deprivation of property rights, and no due process concerns arise.

Sources: Congress.gov: HR 2400 summary

Report an error in this grade
No account needed. Or email hello@valuesforamerica.com. How reports are handled.

What should pass

“VFA SI Solution”

No solution yet

A sourced SI draft appears here once it passes automated checks (Constitution citation, source verification, independent SI critic). How publication works.

Share card

1200×675 PNG for X, Threads, LinkedIn and messages. Free to share with a link back to this page.

For journalists and bloggers

“Embed this grade”

Free to use with the link back. The badge and card update when the grade changes. Embed terms →

VFA Constitution grade for H.R. 2400

← Back to the Republic