H.R. 1940 explained  ·  119th Congress  ·  Pending in Congress

Tanning Tax Repeal Act of 2025

Create a free account or sign in to follow H.R. 1940 and get alerts. Policy area: Taxation Create a free account or sign in to follow the Taxation policy area and get alerts. ▲ 593 days since action Sponsor: Carol D. Miller, WV-01, R → Congress.gov

Cosponsors: 26 (0 D, 26 R) · per Congress.gov, 2026-10-12

Introduced: 2025-03-06

Latest action (2025-03-06): Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

What H.R. 1940 does, in plain terms

Tanning Tax Repeal Act of 2025 This bill repeals the 10% excise tax imposed on the amount paid for indoor tanning services.

Official summary by the Congressional Research Service, via Congress.gov.

Constitution Index

“VFA Constitution grade”

A

Constitutionally sound

Graded 2026-10-11

SI-generated grade · five published checks · not individually reviewed by a person · methodology

The bill simply repeals a federal excise tax on indoor tanning services. Repealing a tax is well within Congress's broad taxing power under Article I, Section 8, Clause 1, and it does not infringe any constitutional right. In fact, it reduces the federal footprint and returns decision-making to individuals and states, aligning with constitutional principles of limited government and decentralization.

  • ✓ Passes · Enumerated powers
    Congress has explicit authority to levy taxes under Article I, Section 8, Clause 1. Repealing an existing excise tax is a valid exercise of that same power. The bill does not create new federal authority; it removes a federal tax, which is clearly within Congress's enumerated powers.
  • ✓ Passes · Bill of Rights
    The bill does not implicate any of the first ten amendments. It does not restrict speech, religion, assembly, press, petition, arms, quartering, search and seizure, self-incrimination, due process, takings, trial rights, or cruel and unusual punishment. Repealing a tax on tanning services has no bearing on any enumerated right.
  • ✓ Passes · Individual sovereignty
    Repealing a tax reduces government restriction on individual economic activity. Individuals and businesses will retain more of their own property and face less government interference in their choice to provide or use tanning services. This enhances, rather than restricts, individual sovereignty.
  • ✓ Passes · Decentralization
    The bill passes all four questions. Individuals and families can decide for themselves whether to use tanning services without federal involvement. Local communities and states can regulate or tax tanning services as they see fit. The federal government is not consolidating power; it is withdrawing from a specific tax area, leaving more room for individual and state decision-making.
  • ✓ Passes · Due process and takings
    The bill does not deprive anyone of life, liberty, or property without due process. It does not take property; it removes a tax, which leaves more property in private hands. There is no procedural or substantive due process concern, and no takings issue under the Fifth Amendment.

Sources: Congress.gov: HR 1940 summary

Report an error in this grade
No account needed. Or email hello@valuesforamerica.com. How reports are handled.

What should pass

“VFA SI Solution”

No solution yet

A sourced SI draft appears here once it passes automated checks (Constitution citation, source verification, independent SI critic). How publication works.

Share card

1200×675 PNG for X, Threads, LinkedIn and messages. Free to share with a link back to this page.

For journalists and bloggers

“Embed this grade”

Free to use with the link back. The badge and card update when the grade changes. Embed terms →

VFA Constitution grade for H.R. 1940

← Back to the Republic