H.R. 1775 explained  ·  119th Congress  ·  Pending in Congress

Second Chances for Rural Hospitals Act

Create a free account or sign in to follow H.R. 1775 and get alerts. Policy area: Health Create a free account or sign in to follow the Health policy area and get alerts. ▲ 596 days since action Sponsor: Jodey C. Arrington, TX-19, R → Congress.gov

Cosponsors: 9 (3 D, 6 R) · per Congress.gov, 2026-10-12

Introduced: 2025-03-03

Latest action (2025-03-03): Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

What H.R. 1775 does, in plain terms

Second Chances for Rural Hospitals Act This bill allows additional hospitals to qualify as rural emergency hospitals (REHs) under Medicare. In 2020, Congress established REHs as a new Medicare provider designation for hospitals in rural areas providing emergency department services, observation care, and other outpatient medical and health services for which the annual per patient average length of stay does not exceed 24 hours. These hospitals must have been open as of December 27, 2020, in order to qualify for the new REH designation. The bill allows hospitals that were open between January 1, 2014, and December 26, 2020, to also qualify for the REH designation, and it provides for a specific payment structure for these hospitals. The bill's changes take effect beginning in 2027.

Official summary by the Congressional Research Service, via Congress.gov.

Constitution Index

“VFA Constitution grade”

B

Minor constitutional concerns

Graded 2026-10-11

SI-generated grade · five published checks · not individually reviewed by a person · methodology

The bill is a federal spending measure under the Medicare program, which is within Congress's enumerated power to tax and spend for the general welfare. It does not infringe on individual rights, and it does not consolidate power beyond what is necessary for a federal health insurance program. The main constitutional concern is the use of a date-based eligibility cutoff, which could raise equal protection concerns, but this is a minor issue that can be addressed through legislative amendment.

  • ✓ Passes · Enumerated powers
    Congress has the power to tax and spend for the general welfare under Article I, Section 8, Clause 1. Medicare is a federal spending program, and this bill modifies eligibility criteria for a Medicare provider designation. This is a legitimate exercise of the spending power.
  • ✓ Passes · Bill of Rights
    The bill does not implicate any of the first ten amendments. It does not restrict speech, religion, assembly, press, petition, arms, quartering, search and seizure, self-incrimination, due process, takings, trial rights, or cruel and unusual punishment. It is a spending provision that does not affect individual liberties.
  • ✓ Passes · Individual sovereignty
    The bill does not restrict individual freedom. It expands eligibility for a federal program, which is a benefit, not a restriction. Individuals are not compelled to participate, and the bill does not limit personal autonomy in any way.
  • ✓ Passes · Decentralization
    The bill concerns Medicare, a federal program. While healthcare could theoretically be handled at lower levels, the federal government has an established role in funding healthcare for the elderly and rural populations. The bill does not consolidate decision-making upward; it merely adjusts eligibility criteria within an existing federal program. The four-question test: (1) individuals cannot hand…
  • ✓ Passes · Due process and takings
    The bill does not take property or deprive anyone of due process. It provides a benefit to certain hospitals. The date-based eligibility cutoff could be seen as arbitrary, but it is a rational legislative classification and does not violate due process. The bill does not involve any taking of property.

Sources: Congress.gov: HR 1775 summary

Report an error in this grade
No account needed. Or email hello@valuesforamerica.com. How reports are handled.

What should pass

“VFA SI Solution”

No solution yet

A sourced SI draft appears here once it passes automated checks (Constitution citation, source verification, independent SI critic). How publication works.

Share card

1200×675 PNG for X, Threads, LinkedIn and messages. Free to share with a link back to this page.

For journalists and bloggers

“Embed this grade”

Free to use with the link back. The badge and card update when the grade changes. Embed terms →

VFA Constitution grade for H.R. 1775

← Back to the Republic