Real bill currently in Congress  c/o  HR/119/10141

To designate the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 4450 Oak Park Lane in Fort Worth, Texas, as the "United States Representative Kay Granger Post Office Building".

Policy area: Government Operations and Politics ▲ 11 days since action Sponsor: Craig A. Goldman, TX-12, R → Congress.gov

Latest action (2026-08-24): Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

Official summary

This bill designates the facility of the United States Postal Service located at 4450 Oak Park Lane in Fort Worth, Texas, as the "United States Representative Kay Granger Post Office Building".

The Framers

“Founders’ Verdict”

CONSTITUTIONAL

Confidence 1.00

Synthesis

Unanimous concurrence (4-0): Naming a federal postal facility is a lawful incident of Congress's express power 'To establish Post Offices and post Roads' under Article I, Section 8, Clause 7, carried into execution through the Necessary and Proper Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 18) and Congress's authority over federal property (Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2). The designation confers no hereditary rank or title of nobility (Article I, Section 9, Clause 8), constitutes no bill of attainder, commands nothing of the States or private citizens, and intrudes upon no right secured by the first ten Amendments or powers reserved under Amendment X. Per McCulloch v. Maryland (1819), the means are plainly adapted to a legitimate end within the scope of an enumerated power.

Hamilton YES

The measure before us is a mere designation of name upon a facility already lawfully established by the national government. The power of Congress over the posts is explicit and unqualified: Article I, Section 8, Clause 7 empowers the legislature 'To establish Post Offices and post Roads.' A power to establish carries with it, by every sound rule of construction, the incidental authority to govern the character, management, and designation of those establishments. Further, Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2 vests in Congress the power to make 'all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Terr…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 7 Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2 Article I, Section 9, Clause 8 Federalist No. 84 Federalist No. 27
Jefferson YES

The power to establish Post Offices is expressly granted to Congress by Article I, Section 8, Clause 7, and the giving of a name to a federal postal facility is a mere incident of that grant, properly carried into execution under the Necessary and Proper Clause of Article I, Section 8, Clause 18. This act neither abridges the freedom of speech, or of the press, nor touches the free exercise of religion, nor the security of persons and papers guarded by the Fourth Amendment, nor any other right secured by the first ten amendments. It commands nothing of the several States and assumes no authori…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 7 Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 Amendment X Article I, Section 9, Clause 8
Madison YES

The power 'To establish Post Offices and post Roads' is expressly vested in the Congress by Article I, Section 8, Clause 7. As I observed in Federalist No. 44, the communication among the parts of the Union by post is a power of manifest necessity to the national government, and the designation of a name upon a facility so established is an incident to its establishment and administration. The measure exercises no authority beyond the enumeration; it creates no hereditary distinction or dignity of office, and therefore transgresses neither the prohibition of titles of nobility in Article I, Se…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 7 Article I, Section 9, Clause 3 Federalist No. 44 Federalist No. 10
Marshall YES

The power to establish Post Offices is expressly vested in the national legislature by Article I, Section 8, Clause 7. A designation of the name borne by a postal facility is an incident of that express grant — a means of ordering and administering the postal establishment, and nothing more. Where the end is legitimate and within the scope of the Constitution, all appropriate means which are plainly adapted to that end, and which are not prohibited, may be lawfully employed; so this Court held in McCulloch v. Maryland (1819). I have examined the measure against every prohibition of the Constit…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 7 Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 Article I, Section 9, Clause 8 McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) Marbury v. Madison (1803)

What should pass

“AI Consensus Solution”

No solution yet

Daily synthesis runs at 06:00 UTC. This bill's consensus draft will appear on the next pass.

← Back to the Republic