H.R. 10136 explained  ·  119th Congress  ·  Pending in Congress

Crossett Experimental Forest Act of 2026

Create a free account or sign in to follow H.R. 10136 and get alerts. Policy area: Public Lands and Natural Resources Create a free account or sign in to follow the Public Lands and Natural Resources policy area and get alerts. ▲ 34 days since action Sponsor: Bruce Westerman, AR-04, R → Congress.gov

Cosponsors: none · per Congress.gov, 2026-10-14

Introduced: 2026-08-20

Latest action (2026-09-15): Ordered to be Reported in the Nature of a Substitute by Unanimous Consent.

What H.R. 10136 does, in plain terms

The Congressional Research Service has not published a summary of H.R. 10136 yet. Its official title: “Crossett Experimental Forest Act of 2026”.

Constitution Index

“VFA Constitution grade”

Not graded yet

H.R. 10136 has not been graded yet. New measures with an official summary are graded daily under the published rubric.

The Framers

“Founders’ Verdict”

CONSTITUTIONAL

Confidence 1.00

Archived SI output (machine-generated)

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI verdict was machine-generated by software and predates the review desk; check it against the official bill text.

Synthesis

All four Founders agree that the bill is constitutional, as it is a valid exercise of Congress's power under the Property Clause (Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2) to dispose of federal property. The transfer to the State of Arkansas does not violate any constitutional provisions, including the Tenth Amendment or the Bill of Rights, and is supported by the Necessary and Proper Clause and relevant precedent.

Hamilton YES

The proposed bill falls squarely within the constitutional authority of Congress to dispose of federal property. The Property Clause of Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2 grants Congress the power to 'dispose of and make all needful Rules and Regulations respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the United States.' This conveyance to the State of Arkansas is a straightforward exercise of that power. Additionally, the Necessary and Proper Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 18) authorizes Congress to enact legislation that is appropriate to carry out its enumerated powers, including…

Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2 Article I, Section 8, Clause 18
Jefferson YES

The Constitution expressly grants Congress the power to dispose of federal property under Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2. This bill, which directs the Secretary of Agriculture to convey the Crossett Experimental Forest to the State of Arkansas, is a straightforward exercise of that power. The Tenth Amendment confirms that powers not delegated to the United States are reserved to the States, but here the delegation is clear and explicit. There is no infringement upon individual liberties or state sovereignty, as the conveyance is a voluntary transfer of federal land to a state government for i…

Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2 Amendment X
Madison YES

The Constitution expressly grants Congress the power to dispose of and make all needful rules and regulations respecting the territory or other property belonging to the United States. This bill, which directs the Secretary of Agriculture to convey a specific federal forest to the State of Arkansas, is a straightforward exercise of that power. It does not exceed the enumerated powers of Congress, nor does it encroach upon any state authority reserved by the Tenth Amendment. The transfer is a permissible legislative action to manage federal property, consistent with the principle that the feder…

Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2 Federalist No. 45
Marshall YES

The Constitution vests in Congress the power to dispose of and make all needful rules and regulations respecting the territory or other property belonging to the United States. Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2 grants Congress plenary authority over federal property. The conveyance of the Crossett Experimental Forest to the State of Arkansas is an exercise of that power, and no constitutional impediment appears. The action is a legitimate disposition of federal property, and the judiciary will not intrude upon the legislative discretion in such matters, as established in Marbury v. Madison (1803…

Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2 Marbury v. Madison (1803)
Report an error in this Founders' Verdict
No account needed. Or email hello@valuesforamerica.com. How reports are handled.

What should pass

“VFA SI Solution”

No solution yet

A sourced SI draft appears here once it passes automated checks (Constitution citation, source verification, independent SI critic). How publication works.

Share card

1200×675 PNG for X, Threads, LinkedIn and messages. Free to share with a link back to this page.

For journalists and bloggers

“Embed this grade”

Free to use with the link back. The badge and card update when the grade changes. Embed terms →

VFA Constitution grade for H.R. 10136

← Back to the Republic