H.R. 10125 explained  ·  119th Congress  ·  Pending in Congress

NO PROFIT Act

Create a free account or sign in to follow H.R. 10125 and get alerts. Policy area: Finance and Financial Sector Create a free account or sign in to follow the Finance and Financial Sector policy area and get alerts. ▲ 60 days since action Sponsor: James A. Himes, CT-04, D → Congress.gov

Cosponsors: 5 (5 D, 0 R) · per Congress.gov, 2026-10-14

Introduced: 2026-08-20

Latest action (2026-08-20): Referred to the Committee on Financial Services, and in addition to the Committees on Agriculture, and Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

What H.R. 10125 does, in plain terms

The Congressional Research Service has not published a summary of H.R. 10125 yet. Its official title: “NO PROFIT Act”.

Constitution Index

“VFA Constitution grade”

Not graded yet

H.R. 10125 has not been graded yet. New measures with an official summary are graded daily under the published rubric.

The Framers

“Founders’ Verdict”

CONDITIONAL

Confidence 0.75

Archived SI output (machine-generated)

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI verdict was machine-generated by software and predates the review desk; check it against the official bill text.

Synthesis

The bill is constitutional only if it is a valid exercise of an enumerated power (such as the Commerce Clause), does not effect a taking of property without just compensation under the Fifth Amendment, and is narrowly tailored to a legitimate federal interest without intruding upon powers reserved to the states by the Tenth Amendment.

Hamilton CONDITIONAL

The bill's title, 'NO PROFIT Act,' suggests a restriction on private profit, which implicates property rights and the scope of federal power. Congress possesses enumerated powers under Article I, Section 8, including the Commerce Clause (Clause 3) and the Necessary and Proper Clause (Clause 18), which may authorize regulation of financial and commercial sectors. However, the Fifth Amendment prohibits the taking of private property without just compensation. A blanket prohibition on profit, without clear nexus to a valid federal objective, could constitute an uncompensated taking. Furthermore, …

Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 Fifth Amendment Federalist No. 78
Jefferson NO

This bill, by its very title and subject matter, seeks to regulate the financial sector at the federal level, an area not enumerated in the Constitution. The Tenth Amendment reserves all powers not delegated to the United States to the States and to the people. The federal government possesses only those powers expressly granted, and the regulation of profit-making enterprises, unless tied to interstate commerce in a manner that directly affects the enumerated powers, is a matter for the States. The proposed act, without specific text, appears to impose federal restrictions on private financia…

Amendment X Article I, Section 8
Madison CONDITIONAL

The constitutionality of the NO PROFIT Act depends entirely on its specific provisions, as the text is not provided. Generally, Congress may regulate financial and commercial activities under the Commerce Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3) and the Necessary and Proper Clause, but only if such regulation pertains to interstate commerce or is necessary to effectuate an enumerated power. If the Act seeks to prohibit profit-making in sectors traditionally reserved to the states, such as the internal governance of corporations or nonprofit organizations not engaged in interstate commerce, it w…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 The Tenth Amendment Federalist No. 45
Marshall CONDITIONAL

The Constitution vests in Congress the power to regulate commerce among the several states, and to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution that power. The NO PROFIT Act, as a measure addressing financial practices and fees, falls within the ambit of the Commerce Clause, for financial transactions are part of the stream of commerce. However, the constitutionality of this Act must be determined by the specific provisions it contains. If it imposes regulations that are a reasonable and appropriate means of effectuating the legitimate ends of commerce regulati…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 (Commerce Clause) Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 (Necessary and Proper Clause) McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)
Report an error in this Founders' Verdict
No account needed. Or email hello@valuesforamerica.com. How reports are handled.

What should pass

“VFA SI Solution”

No solution yet

A sourced SI draft appears here once it passes automated checks (Constitution citation, source verification, independent SI critic). How publication works.

Share card

1200×675 PNG for X, Threads, LinkedIn and messages. Free to share with a link back to this page.

For journalists and bloggers

“Embed this grade”

Free to use with the link back. The badge and card update when the grade changes. Embed terms →

VFA Constitution grade for H.R. 10125

← Back to the Republic