Real bill currently in Congress  c/o  HR/119/10120

National Flood Impact Reduction and Resilience Act of 2026

Policy area: Water Resources Development ▲ 15 days since action Sponsor: Donald S. Beyer, VA-08, D → Congress.gov

Latest action (2026-08-20): Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.

The Framers

“Founders’ Verdict”

CONDITIONAL

Confidence 0.75

Synthesis

The bill is constitutional only if its scope is limited to interstate flood impacts and does not encroach on state police powers over local land use and floodplain management, as reserved by the Tenth Amendment.

Hamilton YES

This bill is constitutional under the Commerce Clause and the General Welfare Clause. The regulation of flood control and resilience measures directly affects interstate commerce, as floods disrupt trade, transportation, and economic activity across state lines. Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 grants Congress power to regulate commerce among the several states, and floods are a national concern requiring coordinated federal action. Additionally, Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 empowers Congress to provide for the general welfare, and reducing flood losses protects lives and property, a clear pub…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 Federalist No. 23
Jefferson NO

The Constitution grants Congress only enumerated powers, and among them is no general authority to establish a national program for flood reduction or resilience. Such matters are properly reserved to the states under the Tenth Amendment, as they pertain to local land use, infrastructure, and public safety. To permit the federal government to command a coordinated effort in this domain would expand its jurisdiction beyond the strict limits of the charter, undermining the sovereignty of the states and the liberties of the people. The commerce power does not extend to every activity that may aff…

Amendment X Article I, Section 8
Madison CONDITIONAL

The proposed National Flood Impact Reduction and Resilience Program, as a coordinated Federal effort, must be carefully examined to ensure it does not exceed the enumerated powers of Congress. The Constitution grants Congress authority over interstate commerce (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3) and the power to provide for the general welfare through taxation and spending (Article I, Section 8, Clause 1), but only for purposes that are truly national in scope and not merely local. Flood control and resilience may involve interstate waterways and affect commerce, thus falling within federal purvi…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 Tenth Amendment Federalist No. 45
Marshall YES

This bill is constitutional as it falls within the enumerated powers of Congress to regulate interstate commerce and provide for the general welfare. The Constitution grants Congress the power to 'regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, and among the several States, and with the Indian Tribes' (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3). Floods that affect navigable waters and interstate commerce are properly subject to federal regulation, as established in Gibbons v. Ogden (1824), which held that Congress's commerce power extends to all 'commerce which concerns more States than one.' Additionally, the N…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 (Commerce Clause) Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 (Necessary and Proper Clause) Gibbons v. Ogden (1824)

What should pass

“AI Consensus Solution”

No solution yet

Daily synthesis runs at 06:00 UTC. This bill's consensus draft will appear on the next pass.

← Back to the Republic