H.R. 10115 explained  ·  119th Congress  ·  Pending in Congress

Radiation Exposure Compensation Reauthorization Act of 2026

Create a free account or sign in to follow H.R. 10115 and get alerts. Policy area: Labor and Employment Create a free account or sign in to follow the Labor and Employment policy area and get alerts. ▲ 63 days since action Sponsor: James C. Moylan, GU-00, R → Congress.gov

Cosponsors: 16 (13 D, 3 R) · per Congress.gov, 2026-10-14

Introduced: 2026-08-17

Latest action (2026-08-17): Referred to the Committee on the Judiciary, and in addition to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

What H.R. 10115 does, in plain terms

The Congressional Research Service has not published a summary of H.R. 10115 yet. Its official title: “Radiation Exposure Compensation Reauthorization Act of 2026”.

Constitution Index

“VFA Constitution grade”

Not graded yet

H.R. 10115 has not been graded yet. New measures with an official summary are graded daily under the published rubric.

The Framers

“Founders’ Verdict”

CONDITIONAL

Confidence 0.75

Archived SI output (machine-generated)

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI verdict was machine-generated by software and predates the review desk; check it against the official bill text.

Synthesis

The bill is constitutional only if compensation is strictly limited to injuries directly caused by federal activities (e.g., nuclear weapons testing and uranium mining under federal authority), and if it does not expand federal power into areas reserved to the states under the Tenth Amendment. It must be tied to enumerated powers such as the Spending Clause and Necessary and Proper Clause, and must not create a general entitlement or interfere with state tort law.

Hamilton YES

The Congress possesses the constitutional authority to enact this compensation program under the Spending Clause, which empowers it to provide for the general welfare (Article I, Section 8, Clause 1). Compensating individuals injured by federal nuclear testing and uranium mining activities is a legitimate exercise of the power to pay debts and provide for the common defense. Additionally, the Necessary and Proper Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 18) allows Congress to make laws that are essential to executing its enumerated powers, including the regulation of interstate commerce and the ma…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 Federalist No. 23 Federalist No. 33
Jefferson CONDITIONAL

This bill proposes federal compensation for individuals harmed by radiation exposure, likely from activities such as nuclear testing or uranium mining. Under the Constitution, the federal government possesses only enumerated powers. Article I, Section 8 grants Congress the power to provide for the general welfare, but this must be exercised strictly and not as a pretext for expanding federal authority into areas reserved to the states. The Tenth Amendment reserves to the states or the people all powers not delegated to the United States. Compensation for injuries, particularly those arising fr…

Amendment X Article I, Section 8 Amendment V
Madison CONDITIONAL

The proposed reauthorization of compensation for radiation exposure may be constitutional if it is strictly limited to injuries directly caused by federal activities, such as nuclear weapons testing and uranium mining conducted under federal authority. The Spending Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 1) empowers Congress to pay debts and provide for the common defense, which could justify compensating those harmed by federal operations. However, I caution against any expansion of this program to cover injuries from non-federal sources or to create a general entitlement, as that would exceed t…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 Federalist No. 45 Tenth Amendment
Marshall CONDITIONAL

The Radiation Exposure Compensation Reauthorization Act of 2026, as a federal compensation scheme, must be assessed under the enumerated powers of Congress. The Constitution vests Congress with authority to provide for the general welfare and to regulate commerce among the several states. If this bill is a means to remedy injuries arising from activities that fall within the federal commerce power or from the exercise of other express powers—such as the management of federal property or the conduct of war—it may be sustained. However, to be constitutional, the compensation must be a necessary …

Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 (General Welfare Clause) Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 (Necessary and Proper Clause) McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) (implied powers and broad discretion of Congress) Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) (broad interpretation of commerce power)
Report an error in this Founders' Verdict
No account needed. Or email hello@valuesforamerica.com. How reports are handled.

What should pass

“VFA SI Solution”

No solution yet

A sourced SI draft appears here once it passes automated checks (Constitution citation, source verification, independent SI critic). How publication works.

Share card

1200×675 PNG for X, Threads, LinkedIn and messages. Free to share with a link back to this page.

For journalists and bloggers

“Embed this grade”

Free to use with the link back. The badge and card update when the grade changes. Embed terms →

VFA Constitution grade for H.R. 10115

← Back to the Republic