H.R. 10108 explained  ·  119th Congress  ·  Pending in Congress

Hazardous Materials Transparency Act

Create a free account or sign in to follow H.R. 10108 and get alerts. Policy area: Armed Forces and National Security Create a free account or sign in to follow the Armed Forces and National Security policy area and get alerts. ▲ 67 days since action Sponsor: Derek Tran, CA-45, D → Congress.gov

Cosponsors: none · per Congress.gov, 2026-10-14

Introduced: 2026-08-13

Latest action (2026-08-13): Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.

What H.R. 10108 does, in plain terms

The Congressional Research Service has not published a summary of H.R. 10108 yet. Its official title: “Hazardous Materials Transparency Act”.

Constitution Index

“VFA Constitution grade”

Not graded yet

H.R. 10108 has not been graded yet. New measures with an official summary are graded daily under the published rubric.

The Framers

“Founders’ Verdict”

CONDITIONAL

Confidence 0.75

Archived SI output (machine-generated)

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI verdict was machine-generated by software and predates the review desk; check it against the official bill text.

Synthesis

The bill is constitutional only if it is limited to hazardous materials affecting interstate commerce or national defense, and if it does not infringe on state police powers, military internal operations, or executive authority. It must be narrowly tailored under the Commerce Clause and Necessary and Proper Clause, while respecting the Tenth Amendment and separation of powers.

Hamilton CONDITIONAL

This bill, which mandates transparency regarding hazardous materials, must be carefully examined under the Constitution's grant of enumerated powers. Congress possesses authority under Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 to regulate interstate commerce, and under Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 to make all laws necessary and proper for executing its powers. However, if this legislation intrudes upon matters of national defense or military operations without clear constitutional warrant, it may exceed the proper scope of federal power. The Federalist No. 23 emphasizes that the powers necessary for t…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 Federalist No. 23
Jefferson NO

This act, by requiring federal oversight and transparency of hazardous materials, exceeds the limited powers delegated to the general government. The Constitution grants no express authority to the Congress to regulate the internal commerce or safety of materials within a state, and such matters are reserved to the states or the people. The Tenth Amendment explicitly reserves all powers not delegated to the United States, nor prohibited to the states, to the states respectively, or to the people. Furthermore, the First Amendment protects the freedom of speech and press, and while transparency …

Amendment X Amendment I
Madison CONDITIONAL

This bill, which mandates transparency regarding hazardous materials, must be examined under the principle of enumerated powers. Congress may regulate interstate commerce in hazardous materials under Article I, Section 8, Clause 3, but if the bill extends to intrastate activities or imposes requirements on state governments without clear constitutional authority, it risks overstepping the limited powers granted to the federal government. Additionally, the bill's referral to the Committee on Armed Services suggests a national defense purpose, which is permissible under Article I, Section 8, Cla…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 Article I, Section 8, Clause 12 Tenth Amendment Federalist No. 45
Marshall CONDITIONAL

The Hazardous Materials Transparency Act, as a federal measure, may be constitutionally sound if it falls within the enumerated powers of Congress, particularly the power to regulate interstate commerce under Article I, Section 8, Clause 3, and the power to provide for the common defense under Article I, Section 8, Clause 12. However, the constitutionality of such an act depends on its specific provisions. If it imposes transparency requirements on the handling of hazardous materials in a manner that directly affects interstate commerce or national security, it may be a proper exercise of cong…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 (Commerce Clause) Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 (Necessary and Proper Clause) Tenth Amendment McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) Gibbons v. Ogden (1824)
Report an error in this Founders' Verdict
No account needed. Or email hello@valuesforamerica.com. How reports are handled.

What should pass

“VFA SI Solution”

Read full document →

Archived SI output (machine-generated) · No editorial review recorded

This historical draft has no editorial review time on record. Check its claims against the original bill and current law.

Hazardous Materials Transparency and Federalism Act of 2025

Generated by VFA SI Solutions

To protect public health and safety by increasing transparency about the presence and use of hazardous materials in products and facilities, thereby enabling informed decision-making by consumers, workers, and regulators.

Bipartisan rationale: Honors Democratic priorities: public health protection, environmental transparency, and federal baseline standards. Honors Republican priorities: limited federal reach through Commerce Clause nexus, protection of trade secrets and national security, non-preemption of state police powers, sunset provision to prevent permanent expansion, and cost containment through fee-based funding and spending caps.

Funding: Fees imposed on regulated entities proport Not to exceed $50 million annu Sunset 5y Oversight: Joint oversight by the House C Enforcement: Civil penalties of up to $25,000 per
→ Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 (Commerce Clause) → Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 (Necessary and Proper Clause) → Tenth Amendment → Fifth Amendment Due Process Clause (protection of trade secrets)

Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 Amendment X Amendment V

Brief for congressional offices →

Report an error in this Solution
No account needed. Or email hello@valuesforamerica.com. How reports are handled.

Citizen Consensus

“Do you support this VFA SI Solution?”

One vote per verified account; you can change it any time. Only verified accounts count, results publish once 30 verified people have voted, and state and district results count only people who attested a home ZIP code. How this works.

Email verification is not switched on yet, so no vote counts toward results yet. Votes cast now are saved and count once the voter verifies their email address.

Add a short reason (optional)

/280 · no links or contact details · reasons are reviewed before anyone sees them, and many never are shown.

Your vote is saved but held out of published results by an automated integrity check (for example, several accounts voting from one browser).

Your vote is saved. It will count once you verify your email address. Verify on your account page.

Your vote counts nationally. Add your home ZIP code to count in your state and district too.

Your vote counts nationally and in .

Reason saved privately; it is shown only if it passes review.

A sudden surge of votes on this item was flagged and is under review; votes from new accounts in that surge are held out until it is resolved.

National, state and district results →

Share card

1200×675 PNG for X, Threads, LinkedIn and messages. Free to share with a link back to this page.

For journalists and bloggers

“Embed this grade”

Free to use with the link back. The badge and card update when the grade changes. Embed terms →

VFA Constitution grade for H.R. 10108

← Back to the Republic