Real bill currently in Congress  c/o  HR/119/10098

Restoring the Death Penalty in DC Act

Latest action (2026-08-13): Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on the Judiciary, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

The Framers

“Founders’ Verdict”

CONDITIONAL

Confidence 0.75

Synthesis

Congress has plenary authority under Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 to legislate for the District of Columbia, including defining crimes and punishments such as the death penalty. However, the constitutionality of this bill depends on strict compliance with the Fifth Amendment's due process requirements and the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishments, including precise definition of capital crimes, procedural safeguards, and non-arbitrary application.

Hamilton YES

The Constitution grants Congress plenary legislative authority over the District of Columbia under Article I, Section 8, Clause 17, which empowers Congress 'to exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District.' This power is absolute and includes the authority to define crimes and prescribe punishments, including capital punishment, within the District. The Bill of Rights, including the Eighth Amendment's prohibition on cruel and unusual punishments, does not categorically bar the death penalty, as the Constitution itself contemplates capital punishment in the Fifth A…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 Fifth Amendment Federalist No. 43
Jefferson NO

This bill exceeds the limited powers delegated to Congress by the Constitution. The Tenth Amendment reserves to the States or to the people all powers not expressly granted to the United States. While Congress has authority over the District of Columbia under Article I, Section 8, Clause 17, the imposition of the death penalty for crimes within the District must be strictly construed. The Eighth Amendment prohibits cruel and unusual punishments, and the death penalty, being irrevocable and subject to fallible human judgment, risks violating this protection. Moreover, the Bill of Rights, partic…

Amendment VIII Amendment X Article I, Section 8, Clause 17
Madison CONDITIONAL

The Constitution grants Congress plenary legislative authority over the District of Columbia under Article I, Section 8, Clause 17, which empowers Congress 'to exercise exclusive Legislation in all Cases whatsoever, over such District.' This power is broad and includes the definition of crimes and punishments within the District. However, the Eighth Amendment prohibits 'cruel and unusual punishments,' and the imposition of the death penalty must be carefully confined to the most heinous offenses, consistent with due process and the principles of limited government. The bill's constitutionality…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 Eighth Amendment Federalist No. 43
Marshall YES

The Constitution vests in Congress plenary legislative authority over the District of Columbia, as the seat of the national government, under Article I, Section 8, Clause 17, which grants Congress exclusive legislation in all cases whatsoever over such district. This power includes the authority to define crimes and prescribe punishments, including the death penalty, for offenses committed within the District. The Necessary and Proper Clause, Article I, Section 8, Clause 18, further empowers Congress to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution its enumerate…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) Marbury v. Madison (1803)

What should pass

“AI Consensus Solution”

Read full document →

District of Columbia Capital Punishment for Heinous Crimes Act of 2025

To authorize the death penalty for certain serious crimes committed in the District of Columbia, ensuring that the most heinous offenses are subject to capital punishment while respecting constitutional safeguards.

Bipartisan rationale: Democratic priorities honored: robust due process protections (two attorneys, automatic appeal, proportionality review, exclusion of juveniles and intellectually disabled), a sunset clause to allow evaluation, and an independent oversight commission to prevent arbitrary application. Republican priorities honored: authorizing the death penalty for the most heinous crimes (murder of law enforcement, terrorism, mass murder), ensuring swift justice through clear procedures, and maintaining federal authority over D.C. crimes.

Funding: Appropriations from the general fund of th Total annual funding cap of $1 Sunset 5y Oversight: District of Columbia Capital P Enforcement: The United States Attorney for the D

Vote-count path: ~240 House votes: 180 Republicans + 60 moderate Democrats from safe districts; ~58 Senate votes: 50 Republicans + 8 Democrats from states with capital punishment, with possible cloture challenges requiring 60 votes if filibustered.

→ Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 (plenary authority over the District of Columbia) → Fifth Amendment (Due Process Clause — requires fair procedures in capital cases) → Eighth Amendment (prohibition on cruel and unusual punishments — requires proportionality and non-arbitrariness) → Fourteenth Amendment (Equal Protection Clause — applied to D.C. through Bolling v. Sharpe, requiring non-discriminatory application)

← Back to the Republic