H.R. 10092 explained  ·  119th Congress  ·  Pending in Congress

GATE Act of 2026

Create a free account or sign in to follow H.R. 10092 and get alerts. Policy area: Science, Technology, Communications Create a free account or sign in to follow the Science, Technology, Communications policy area and get alerts. ▲ 67 days since action Sponsor: Pat Harrigan, NC-10, R → Congress.gov

Cosponsors: 8 (0 D, 8 R) · per Congress.gov, 2026-10-14

Introduced: 2026-08-13

Latest action (2026-08-13): Referred to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.

What H.R. 10092 does, in plain terms

The Congressional Research Service has not published a summary of H.R. 10092 yet. Its official title: “GATE Act of 2026”.

Constitution Index

“VFA Constitution grade”

Not graded yet

H.R. 10092 has not been graded yet. New measures with an official summary are graded daily under the published rubric.

The Framers

“Founders’ Verdict”

CONSTITUTIONAL

Confidence 0.85

Archived SI output (machine-generated)

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI verdict was machine-generated by software and predates the review desk; check it against the official bill text.

Synthesis

The bill is constitutional as an exercise of Congress's enumerated powers over federal property, naturalization, and national security, provided the class of excluded foreign nationals is defined with precision and tied to demonstrable security risks.

Hamilton YES

This bill is a constitutional exercise of Congress's enumerated powers. Congress possesses plenary authority over naturalization and immigration under Article I, Section 8, Clause 4, and the federal government, as proprietor of National Laboratories, may regulate access to its property under Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2. The restriction on foreign nationals' admission to sensitive scientific facilities falls squarely within the federal duty to provide for the common defense, a power I argued in Federalist No. 23 must be broad and unconfined. The bill does not constitute a bill of attainder …

Article I, Section 8, Clause 4 Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2 Federalist No. 23
Jefferson YES

The Congress of the United States, under the authority vested in it by Article I, Section 8, Clause 17, possesses plenary and exclusive legislative power over federal enclaves, which lawfully extends to the National Laboratories as federal property. The regulation of admission to such facilities is a proper exercise of this proprietary authority, intended to preserve the public security and the operation of these institutions. The Tenth Amendment confirms that all powers not delegated to the Union are reserved to the States, yet this power is clearly delegated; the regulation of federal proper…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 17 Amendment X Article I, Section 8, Clause 18
Madison CONDITIONAL

The proposed measure lies within the legislative authority of Congress to regulate federal property and to enact laws necessary and proper for the security of the United States. National Laboratories are federal establishments, and the Congress may prescribe reasonable rules for their governance and for access to them. However, the Constitution demands that legislative restrictions be grounded in the public good and not operate as arbitrary or vindictive proscriptions against a class. The phrase 'certain foreign nationals' requires a precise and principled definition, tied to demonstrable risk…

Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2 Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 Federalist No. 45
Marshall YES

This bill rests upon the constitutional authority of Congress to regulate the conduct of federal establishments and to provide for the common defense and general welfare. The National Laboratories, being instrumentalities of the United States, are subject to the plenary legislative power of Congress. The Constitution grants to Congress the power to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution its enumerated powers, and the regulation of access to federal facilities is an incident of that authority. Moreover, the right of the government to control the persons wh…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 Marbury v. Madison (1803)
Report an error in this Founders' Verdict
No account needed. Or email hello@valuesforamerica.com. How reports are handled.

What should pass

“VFA SI Solution”

Read full document →

Archived SI output (machine-generated) · No editorial review recorded

This historical draft has no editorial review time on record. Check its claims against the original bill and current law.

National Laboratory Foreign Access Risk Screening Act

Generated by VFA SI Solutions

Restrict access of certain foreign nationals to U.S. National Laboratories to protect national security and sensitive technology.

Bipartisan rationale: Honors Republican priorities by maintaining strong national security screening and denying access to high-risk foreign nationals. Honors Democratic priorities by preserving scientific openness, ensuring due process through individualized assessments and appeals, and avoiding discriminatory blanket bans. Both parties benefit from a tailored, evidence-based system that protects critical technology while allowing legitimate scientific collaboration.

Funding: Existing Department of Energy administrati $5 million per year for the fi Sunset 5y Oversight: Department of Energy Office of Enforcement: Civil penalties of up to $50,000 per
→ Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 (Necessary and Proper Clause) → Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2 (Property Clause for federal laboratories) → Fifth Amendment (Due Process)

Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2 Amendment V

Brief for congressional offices →

Report an error in this Solution
No account needed. Or email hello@valuesforamerica.com. How reports are handled.

Citizen Consensus

“Do you support this VFA SI Solution?”

One vote per verified account; you can change it any time. Only verified accounts count, results publish once 30 verified people have voted, and state and district results count only people who attested a home ZIP code. How this works.

Email verification is not switched on yet, so no vote counts toward results yet. Votes cast now are saved and count once the voter verifies their email address.

Add a short reason (optional)

/280 · no links or contact details · reasons are reviewed before anyone sees them, and many never are shown.

Your vote is saved but held out of published results by an automated integrity check (for example, several accounts voting from one browser).

Your vote is saved. It will count once you verify your email address. Verify on your account page.

Your vote counts nationally. Add your home ZIP code to count in your state and district too.

Your vote counts nationally and in .

Reason saved privately; it is shown only if it passes review.

A sudden surge of votes on this item was flagged and is under review; votes from new accounts in that surge are held out until it is resolved.

National, state and district results →

Share card

1200×675 PNG for X, Threads, LinkedIn and messages. Free to share with a link back to this page.

For journalists and bloggers

“Embed this grade”

Free to use with the link back. The badge and card update when the grade changes. Embed terms →

VFA Constitution grade for H.R. 10092

← Back to the Republic