H.R. 10081 explained  ·  119th Congress  ·  Pending in Congress

No Utility Junk Fees Act

Create a free account or sign in to follow H.R. 10081 and get alerts. Policy area: Energy Create a free account or sign in to follow the Energy policy area and get alerts. ▲ 70 days since action Sponsor: Eugene Simon Vindman, VA-07, D → Congress.gov

Cosponsors: none · per Congress.gov, 2026-10-14

Introduced: 2026-08-10

Latest action (2026-08-10): Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

What H.R. 10081 does, in plain terms

The Congressional Research Service has not published a summary of H.R. 10081 yet. Its official title: “No Utility Junk Fees Act”.

Constitution Index

“VFA Constitution grade”

Not graded yet

H.R. 10081 has not been graded yet. New measures with an official summary are graded daily under the published rubric.

The Framers

“Founders’ Verdict”

CONDITIONAL

Confidence 0.75

Archived SI output (machine-generated)

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI verdict was machine-generated by software and predates the review desk; check it against the official bill text.

Synthesis

The bill is constitutional only if it is limited to utility fees that substantially affect interstate commerce and does not intrude upon purely intrastate utility operations or state police powers. Congress may regulate such fees under the Commerce Clause and the Necessary and Proper Clause, but must avoid overreach into state-regulated local utility matters.

Hamilton YES

The proposed legislation, which seeks to prohibit unjustified fees imposed by utility providers, is a proper exercise of Congress's power to regulate interstate commerce. Utility services, including the generation, transmission, and distribution of electricity, natural gas, and water, are deeply intertwined with interstate markets and are vital to the economic activity of the Nation. Fees attached to these services directly affect the cost and flow of goods and services across state lines, thereby falling within the sphere of federal authority under the Commerce Clause. Moreover, by prohibitin…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 Article VI, Clause 2 Federalist No. 11
Jefferson CONDITIONAL

This bill, if it merely prohibits deceptive 'junk fees' in utility billing, may be a legitimate exercise of Congress's power to regulate interstate commerce, as utilities often engage in interstate transactions. However, the Tenth Amendment reserves to the states all powers not expressly delegated to the federal government. If this act seeks to dictate the specific rates, fee structures, or internal accounting of local utilities—especially those not engaged in interstate commerce—it would exceed federal authority and intrude upon the reserved police powers of the states. The condition is that …

Amendment X Article I, Section 8, Clause 3
Madison CONDITIONAL

The proposed bill, if it seeks to regulate utility junk fees that substantially affect interstate commerce, may fall within the enumerated power of Congress to regulate commerce among the several states. However, I must caution that the Constitution grants only limited and enumerated powers, and the Tenth Amendment reserves to the states all powers not expressly delegated. The regulation of retail utility rates and fees has traditionally been a matter of state police power, and the federal intrusion is justified only where a clear and substantial connection to interstate commerce exists. If th…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 Tenth Amendment Federalist No. 45 Federalist No. 39
Marshall YES

This bill, the No Utility Junk Fees Act, is a regulation of commerce among the several states. Utility services, including the transmission of electricity, gas, and water, frequently cross state lines and constitute a significant part of interstate commerce. The imposition of hidden or unjustified fees directly burdens that commerce by inflating costs and obscuring prices. Under the Commerce Clause, Congress possesses the authority to regulate such commercial transactions. Moreover, this act is a necessary and proper means to execute that power, as it ensures transparent and fair pricing in th…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 Gibbons v. Ogden (1824)
Report an error in this Founders' Verdict
No account needed. Or email hello@valuesforamerica.com. How reports are handled.

What should pass

“VFA SI Solution”

Read full document →

Archived SI output (machine-generated) · No editorial review recorded

This historical draft has no editorial review time on record. Check its claims against the original bill and current law.

Consumer Utility Fee Integrity Act of 2025

Generated by VFA SI Solutions

To prevent regulated electric utilities from imposing deceptive or unauthorised charges on consumers by making federal energy program financial assistance to states conditional on state adoption and enforcement of rules banning such charges.

Bipartisan rationale: Democratic priorities honored: strong consumer protection against deceptive utility fees, federal oversight to ensure transparency, and enforcement mechanisms. Republican priorities honored: respect for state sovereignty by allowing states to opt out of the condition for certain SEP funds, use of existing state regulatory frameworks, sunset provision to prevent perpetual federal control, and no new federal spending beyond existing appropriations.

Funding: Existing appropriations for the State Ener No additional funds authorised Sunset 5y Oversight: Department of Energy, Office o Enforcement: States that fail to certify complian
→ Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 (Spending Clause – Congress may attach conditions to federal funds as long as they are related to the federal interest in the program and are not coercive) → Tenth Amendment (reserving to states powers not delegated to the United States; this solution respects state autonomy by allowing opt-out and limiting condition to specific program purposes)

Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 Amendment X

Brief for congressional offices →

Report an error in this Solution
No account needed. Or email hello@valuesforamerica.com. How reports are handled.

Citizen Consensus

“Do you support this VFA SI Solution?”

One vote per verified account; you can change it any time. Only verified accounts count, results publish once 30 verified people have voted, and state and district results count only people who attested a home ZIP code. How this works.

Email verification is not switched on yet, so no vote counts toward results yet. Votes cast now are saved and count once the voter verifies their email address.

Add a short reason (optional)

/280 · no links or contact details · reasons are reviewed before anyone sees them, and many never are shown.

Your vote is saved but held out of published results by an automated integrity check (for example, several accounts voting from one browser).

Your vote is saved. It will count once you verify your email address. Verify on your account page.

Your vote counts nationally. Add your home ZIP code to count in your state and district too.

Your vote counts nationally and in .

Reason saved privately; it is shown only if it passes review.

A sudden surge of votes on this item was flagged and is under review; votes from new accounts in that surge are held out until it is resolved.

National, state and district results →

Share card

1200×675 PNG for X, Threads, LinkedIn and messages. Free to share with a link back to this page.

For journalists and bloggers

“Embed this grade”

Free to use with the link back. The badge and card update when the grade changes. Embed terms →

VFA Constitution grade for H.R. 10081

← Back to the Republic