Real bill currently in Congress  c/o  HR/119/10075

First-Time Homebuyer Affordability Act

Latest action (2026-08-10): Referred to the House Committee on Ways and Means.

The Framers

“Founders’ Verdict”

CONSTITUTIONAL

Confidence 0.75

Synthesis

The bill is a constitutional exercise of Congress's power to tax under Article I, Section 8, Clause 1, and the Necessary and Proper Clause, as it adjusts a statutory tax exemption without infringing on state powers or violating any constitutional prohibition.

Hamilton YES

This bill is a straightforward exercise of Congress's constitutional power to lay and collect taxes. The Internal Revenue Code falls squarely within the taxing authority granted by Article I, Section 8, Clause 1. Exempting qualified mortgage bonds from the volume cap is a discretionary choice about the terms of federal tax exemptions, which Congress may adjust as it sees fit. There is no constitutional restriction on such a modification; it does not infringe on any state prerogative or violate any enumerated limit. The power to tax includes the power to exempt, and the volume cap is a purely s…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 Federalist No. 30
Jefferson CONDITIONAL

This bill proposes to exempt certain bonds from a volume cap, which is a federal limitation on state borrowing. While the Constitution grants Congress the power to lay and collect taxes (Article I, Section 8, Clause 1), the Tenth Amendment reserves to the states all powers not delegated to the United States. The volume cap itself may be an overreach into state fiscal affairs, as it restricts state authority to issue bonds for local purposes. However, if the exemption is narrowly tailored to avoid favoring any particular private interest and does not create a federal preference that undermines …

Amendment X Article I, Section 8, Clause 1
Madison YES

The Constitution vests in Congress the power to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts, and excises, and by necessary implication to define the objects and conditions of tax exemptions. The proposed amendment to the Internal Revenue Code, exempting qualified mortgage bonds from the volume cap, falls within this enumerated power. However, I caution that such exemptions must be crafted with an eye to uniformity and the prevention of factional influence, lest they become instruments of partial advantage rather than general welfare. The volume cap itself is a legislative mechanism to control the e…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 Federalist No. 10
Marshall YES

This bill proposes an amendment to the Internal Revenue Code to exempt qualified mortgage bonds from the volume cap. The Constitution grants Congress the power to lay and collect taxes, duties, imposts, and excises, as stated in Article I, Section 8, Clause 1. The necessary and proper clause, Article I, Section 8, Clause 18, further empowers Congress to make all laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into execution the foregoing powers. The regulation of tax exemptions for bonds falls within Congress's broad authority over taxation and spending, as it is a means to promote the g…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)

What should pass

“AI Consensus Solution”

Read full document →

Temporary Targeted Qualified Mortgage Bond Volume Cap Expansion Act of 2025

Increase the supply of affordable mortgage credit by allowing states to issue more tax-exempt qualified mortgage bonds without being limited by the existing state annual volume cap.

Bipartisan rationale: This honors Democratic priorities by expanding funding for affordable homeownership, especially for first-time and low-income buyers, and directing resources to high-cost areas. It honors Republican priorities by including a revenue offset, a five-year sunset, state-driven allocation plans (federalism), and targeted use of tax-exempt financing to avoid a broad addition to the federal debt.

Funding: Extension of the Section 461(l) excess bus Revenue offset of $2.1 billion Sunset 5y Oversight: Secretary of the Treasury, in Enforcement: IRS enforcement under existing priva

Vote-count path: ~230 House votes: 160 D (housing/city caucus) + 70 R (tax reform/revenue-offset friendly) ; ~58 Senate votes: 42 D + 16 R from midwestern and sunbelt states with severe housing shortages, though it may face a filibuster hurdle needing 60 with a few additional GOP tax writers.

→ Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 (taxing and spending) → Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 (necessary and proper) → Amendment X (reserved powers, as the bill leaves allocation discretion to states)

← Back to the Republic