H.J.Res. 89 explained  ·  119th Congress  ·  Became law

Providing congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "California State Motor Vehicle and Engine and Nonroad Engine Pollution Control Standards; The 'Omnibus' Low NOX Regulation; Waiver of Preemption; Notice of Decision".

Create a free account or sign in to follow H.J.Res. 89 and get alerts. Policy area: Environmental Protection Create a free account or sign in to follow the Environmental Protection policy area and get alerts. ▲ 495 days since action Sponsor: Jay Obernolte, CA-23, R → Congress.gov

Cosponsors: 32 (0 D, 32 R) · per Congress.gov, 2026-10-11

Introduced: 2025-04-02

Latest action (2025-06-12): Became Public Law No: 119-17.

What H.J.Res. 89 does, in plain terms

This joint resolution revokes the waiver granted to the California Air Resources Board regarding new emissions standards for new 2024 and subsequent model year on-road heavy-duty vehicles and engines, off-road diesel engines, and off-road diesel-fueled auxiliary power units. (Under the Clean Air Act, California may seek waivers of the preemption prohibiting states from enacting certain emission standards.) Specifically, the joint resolution nullifies the Environmental Protection Agency notice titled California State Motor Vehicle and Engine and Nonroad Engine Pollution Control Standards; The ‘Omnibus’ Low NOX Regulation; Waiver of Preemption; Notice of Decision.

Official summary by the Congressional Research Service, via Congress.gov.

Constitution Index

“VFA Constitution grade”

B

Minor constitutional concerns

Graded 2026-10-08

SI-generated grade · five published checks · not individually reviewed by a person · methodology

Congress used lawful Commerce Clause and review authority to nullify an EPA waiver, with no Bill of Rights, sovereignty, or due process harm. The sole constitutional tension is decentralization: it blocks a state-level pollution program in favor of uniform federal preemption, contrary to Tenth Amendment preference for state handling where feasible. Fixable and minor, supporting grade B.

  • ✓ Passes · Enumerated powers
    Congress acts under Article I, Section 8, Clause 3, the Commerce Clause, which supports Clean Air Act regulation of interstate vehicle and engine markets, and under Article I, Section 8, Clause 18, the Necessary and Proper Clause, as executed through the Congressional Review Act at 5 U.S.C. chapter 8. Disapproval of an executive agency waiver is a legislative check on delegated authority, not an a…
  • ✓ Passes · Bill of Rights
    The resolution restricts no speech, religion, press, assembly under the First Amendment, imposes no search under the Fourth Amendment, and takes no property or liberty under the Fifth Amendment. It removes a regulatory waiver rather than creating a new prohibition on persons, so no provision of the first ten amendments is infringed.
  • ✓ Passes · Individual sovereignty
    The resolution lessens federal permission for stricter state mandates on manufacturers and buyers of heavy-duty vehicles and off-road diesel equipment. It does not limit personal belief, speech, labor, worship, or ownership, and imposes no new mandate on individuals. To the extent it affects conduct, it removes a regulatory burden with no compelling-justification problem under the Ninth Amendment …
  • ✗ Concern · Decentralization
    Vehicle emissions cross state lines and involve interstate commerce, so individual, family, or county control is not sufficient. California has shown a state can set and enforce its own standards, so state handling is feasible under the Tenth Amendment. By nullifying the waiver and restoring uniform federal preemption, the measure consolidates decision-making upward from the state to the federal l…
  • ✓ Passes · Due process and takings
    The measure follows lawful legislative process under Article I, Section 7, with bicameral passage and presentment, resulting in Public Law 119-17. It gives public notice, applies prospectively to model-year standards, and seizes no property or fine without hearing. No taking under the Fifth Amendment Takings Clause and no denial of procedural or substantive due process occurs.

Sources: Congress.gov: HJRES 89 summary

Report an error in this grade
No account needed. Or email hello@valuesforamerica.com. How reports are handled.

What should pass

“VFA SI Solution”

No solution yet

A sourced SI draft appears here once it passes automated checks (Constitution citation, source verification, independent SI critic). How publication works.

Share card

1200×675 PNG for X, Threads, LinkedIn and messages. Free to share with a link back to this page.

For journalists and bloggers

“Embed this grade”

Free to use with the link back. The badge and card update when the grade changes. Embed terms →

VFA Constitution grade for H.J.Res. 89

← Back to the Republic