H.J.Res. 68 explained · 119th Congress · Pending in Congress
Providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign military sale to Israel of certain defense articles and services.
Cosponsors: 13 (13 D, 0 R) · per Congress.gov, 2026-10-12
Introduced: 2025-03-03
Latest action (2025-03-03): Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
What H.J.Res. 68 does, in plain terms
This joint resolution prohibits a proposed foreign military sale of certain defense articles and services to Israel.
Official summary by the Congressional Research Service, via Congress.gov.
Constitution Index
“VFA Constitution grade”
Minor constitutional concerns
Graded 2026-10-11
SI-generated grade · five published checks · not individually reviewed by a person · methodology
The joint resolution is a valid exercise of Congress's enumerated power over foreign commerce and military sales, and it does not infringe on individual rights. The primary constitutional concern is the potential overreach into the President's executive authority over foreign affairs, which creates a minor tension that is fixable through proper legislative-executive coordination.
-
✓ Passes · Enumerated powers
Congress has explicit authority under Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 (the Foreign Commerce Clause) to regulate commerce with foreign nations, which includes the approval or disapproval of foreign military sales. Additionally, Article I, Section 8, Clause 11 grants Congress the power to declare war, and the regulation of arms sales to foreign nations falls within the broader scope of national defen… -
✓ Passes · Bill of Rights
The resolution does not implicate any of the first ten amendments. It does not restrict speech, religion, assembly, press, petition, arms bearing, quartering, search and seizure, self-incrimination, due process, takings, trial rights, or cruel and unusual punishment. It is a foreign policy measure that does not affect the rights of individuals within the United States. -
✓ Passes · Individual sovereignty
The resolution does not restrict the actions of individuals. It concerns a government-to-government transaction (the sale of defense articles to Israel) and does not impose any burden on individual citizens' person, property, speech, labor, or belief. The government's action here is in the realm of foreign affairs, which does not require a compelling justification to restrict individual freedom be… -
✓ Passes · Decentralization
This is a federal action concerning foreign military sales, which is inherently a matter of national sovereignty and cannot be handled by individuals, local communities, or states. The federal government is the only level of government with the constitutional authority to conduct foreign affairs and regulate international commerce. The resolution does not consolidate decision-making upward because… -
✓ Passes · Due process and takings
The resolution does not deprive any person of life, liberty, or property without due process of law, nor does it take private property for public use without just compensation. It is a legislative action that disapproves a proposed sale, which does not affect the property rights of any U.S. citizen. The foreign government (Israel) is not a 'person' under the Fifth Amendment's Due Process Clause, a…
Sources: Congress.gov: HJRES 68 summary
Report an error in this grade
What should pass
“VFA SI Solution”
No solution yet
A sourced SI draft appears here once it passes automated checks (Constitution citation, source verification, independent SI critic). How publication works.
Related on VFA
For journalists and bloggers
“Embed this grade”
Free to use with the link back. The badge and card update when the grade changes. Embed terms →