Real bill currently in Congress  c/o  HJRES/119/214

Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Environmental Protection Agency relating to "California State Nonroad Engine Pollution Control Standards; Small Off-Road Engines Regulations; Notice of Decision".

Policy area: Environmental Protection ▲ 14 days since action Sponsor: Jay Obernolte, CA-23, R → Congress.gov

Latest action (2026-08-10): Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

The Framers

“Founders’ Verdict”

CONDITIONAL

Confidence 0.75

Synthesis

The joint resolution to disapprove the EPA rule is constitutional provided it strictly follows the bicameral passage and presentment to the President required by Article I, Section 7, and does not exceed Congress's enumerated powers under the Commerce Clause or infringe on state sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment.

Hamilton YES

This joint resolution is an exercise of Congress's legislative power under Article I, Section 7, for it is presented to the President and requires bicameral approval. The Congressional Review Act merely provides a mechanism by which Congress may disapprove an agency rule through a law of the United States, exactly as the Constitution contemplates. The rule of the Environmental Protection Agency, though delegated statutory authority, remains subject to the sovereign legislature's authority to control executive action through subsequent legislation. As I argued in Federalist No. 16, the laws of …

Article I, Section 7, Clause 2 Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 Federalist No. 16
Jefferson CONDITIONAL

This bill seeks to disapprove a federal rule that preempts California's own pollution control standards for small off-road engines. Under the Tenth Amendment, powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. The Constitution does not grant Congress or the EPA explicit authority to regulate intrastate pollution from nonroad engines, which is a matter of local police power. However, if the rule is based on a valid exercise of Congress's enumerated powers under Article I, Section 8, such a…

Amendment X Article I, Section 8
Madison YES

This bill exercises the legislative power vested in Congress under Article I, Section 1 by employing a statutory mechanism—the Congressional Review Act—to disapprove an administrative rule. The Constitution grants Congress authority to make laws and to oversee the execution of those laws, and the necessary and proper clause permits the establishment of procedures for reviewing agency actions. As I argued in Federalist No. 51, the separation of powers and checks among departments are essential to preserve liberty; here, Congress checks the Executive's rulemaking through a constitutionally valid…

Article I, Section 1 Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 Federalist No. 51
Marshall CONDITIONAL

This bill seeks to disapprove an EPA rule that approved California's nonroad engine pollution standards. Under the Constitution, Congress possesses the power to regulate interstate commerce, which includes the authority to set uniform national standards for emissions that affect commerce among the states. However, the Clean Air Act, as a valid exercise of Congress's commerce power, may delegate to the EPA the authority to waive federal preemption for California's stricter standards, given California's unique circumstances. The question is whether this congressional disapproval, exercised under…

Article I, Section 1 (All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States) Article I, Section 7 (Every Bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives and the Senate, shall, before it become a Law, be presented to the President of the United States) Marbury v. Madison (1803) (It is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is) McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) (Let the end be legitimate, let it be within the scope of the constitution, and all means which are appropriate, which are plainly adapted to that end, which are not prohibited, but consist with the letter and spirit of the constitution, are constitutional)

What should pass

“AI Consensus Solution”

Read full document →

Uniform Small Off-Road Engine Emissions Standards Act of 2025

To overturn the EPA's approval of California's stricter emissions standards for small off-road engines, thereby preventing a patchwork of state regulations and ensuring a single national standard for these engines.

Bipartisan rationale: Honors Democratic priorities by setting a national emissions standard at least as stringent as California's, ensuring strong environmental protection and reducing air pollution. Honors Republican priorities by establishing regulatory uniformity, reducing compliance costs for manufacturers, and preventing a patchwork of state regulations that burden interstate commerce.

Funding: General revenue (Treasury) $50,000,000 Sunset 10y Oversight: EPA Office of Inspector Genera Enforcement: Civil penalties up to $10,000 per vi

Vote-count path: House: ~260 votes (150 Democrats + 110 Republicans); Senate: ~65 votes (40 Democrats + 25 Republicans)

→ Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 (Commerce Clause) → Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 (Necessary and Proper Clause) → Tenth Amendment (as limited by the preemption provision under the Commerce Clause)

← Back to the Republic