H.Con.Res. 110 explained  ·  119th Congress  ·  Pending in Congress

Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.

Create a free account or sign in to follow H.Con.Res. 110 and get alerts. Policy area: International Affairs Create a free account or sign in to follow the International Affairs policy area and get alerts. ▲ 130 days since action Sponsor: James R. Walkinshaw, VA-11, D → Congress.gov

Cosponsors: 8 (8 D, 0 R) · per Congress.gov, 2026-10-08

Introduced: 2026-06-11

Latest action (2026-06-11): Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.

What H.Con.Res. 110 does, in plain terms

The Congressional Research Service has not published a summary of H.Con.Res. 110 yet. Its official title: “Directing the President, pursuant to section 5(c) of the War Powers Resolution, to remove United States Armed Forces from hostilities with Iran.”.

Constitution Index

“VFA Constitution grade”

Not graded yet

H.Con.Res. 110 has not been graded yet. New measures with an official summary are graded daily under the published rubric.

The Framers

“Founders’ Verdict”

CONDITIONAL

Confidence 0.50

Archived SI output (machine-generated)

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI verdict was machine-generated by software and predates the review desk; check it against the official bill text.

Synthesis

Two Founders (Hamilton, Madison) found the resolution unconstitutional due to infringement on the Commander in Chief power and violation of separation of powers. Two Founders (Jefferson, Marshall) found it conditional: constitutional only if the President engaged in hostilities without a declaration of war or immediate attack, and if the resolution does not intrude on core executive functions.

Hamilton NO

The War Powers Resolution purports to compel the President to withdraw forces without a declaration of war. This infringes upon the Commander in Chief power vested solely in the President by Article II, Section 2, Clause 1. Moreover, the legislative veto mechanism in §5(c) contradicts the principle of separation of powers, as Congress cannot retroactively control the disposition of forces once engaged, except through the power of the purse or impeachment. Federalist No. 70 emphasizes unity and energy in the executive, which would be fatally undermined by such a legislative directive.

Article II, Section 2, Clause 1 Federalist No. 70
Jefferson CONDITIONAL

The War Powers Resolution itself is of dubious constitutionality, as it purports to limit the President's authority as Commander in Chief under Article II, Section 2, Clause 1. However, Congress does possess the sole power to declare war (Article I, Section 8, Clause 11) and to raise and support armies (Article I, Section 8, Clause 12). If the President has engaged hostilities without a declaration of war or an immediate and actual attack upon the United States, then Congress may, by concurrent resolution, direct the removal of forces, as the Tenth Amendment reserves to the states and the peop…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 11 Article II, Section 2, Clause 1 Amendment X
Madison NO

The proposed concurrent resolution attempts to direct the President, as Commander in Chief, to remove armed forces from hostilities. This action would effectively legislate a binding command without the bicameralism and presentment required by Article I, Section 7. The Constitution vests the executive power in the President and makes him the Commander in Chief of the armed forces (Article II, Section 2, Clause 1). While Congress possesses the power to declare war and to raise and support armies, it cannot, by mere concurrent resolution, assume the executive function of directing military opera…

Article I, Section 7 Article II, Section 2, Clause 1 Federalist No. 47 Federalist No. 48
Marshall CONDITIONAL

The War Powers Resolution, enacted under Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution, provides Congress with a mechanism to direct the removal of armed forces from hostilities. However, section 5(c) of that resolution must be examined for consistency with the President's authority as Commander in Chief under Article II, Section 2. The Constitution vests in Congress the power to declare war, and the President has a duty to execute laws faithfully. If the resolution is within Congress's enumerated powers and does not improperly encroach upon the President's core executive functions, it is constitut…

Article I, Section 8 (Congress's power to declare war and make rules for the military) Article II, Section 2 (President as Commander in Chief) Marbury v. Madison (1803) (judicial review) McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) (necessary and proper clause)
Report an error in this Founders' Verdict
No account needed. Or email hello@valuesforamerica.com. How reports are handled.

What should pass

“VFA SI Solution”

No solution yet

A sourced SI draft appears here once it passes automated checks (Constitution citation, source verification, independent SI critic). How publication works.

Share card

1200×675 PNG for X, Threads, LinkedIn and messages. Free to share with a link back to this page.

For journalists and bloggers

“Embed this grade”

Free to use with the link back. The badge and card update when the grade changes. Embed terms →

VFA Constitution grade for H.Con.Res. 110

← Back to the Republic