H.J.Res. 173 explained · 119th Congress · Pending in Congress
Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to "Consumer Financial Protection Circular 2023-02: Reopening Deposit Accounts That Consumers Previously Closed".
Cosponsors: none · per Congress.gov, 2026-10-14
Introduced: 2026-05-04
Latest action (2026-05-04): Referred to the House Committee on Financial Services.
What H.J.Res. 173 does, in plain terms
The Congressional Research Service has not published a summary of H.J.Res. 173 yet. Its official title: “Providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United States Code, of the rule submitted by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection relating to the withdrawal of the rule relating to "Consumer Financial Protection Circular 2023-02: Reopening Deposit Accounts That Consumers Previously Closed".”.
Constitution Index
“VFA Constitution grade”
Not graded yet
H.J.Res. 173 has not been graded yet. New measures with an official summary are graded daily under the published rubric.
The Framers
“Founders’ Verdict”
Confidence 0.75
Archived SI output (machine-generated)No editorial review recorded. This historical SI verdict was machine-generated by software and predates the review desk; check it against the official bill text.
Synthesis
Congress holds authority under Article I to enact joint resolutions disapproving executive agency actions within enumerated powers like commerce regulation, preserving separation of powers (Hamilton, Madison, Marshall).
Congress holds all legislative powers granted by the Constitution and may enact joint resolutions to disapprove executive agency actions, including the withdrawal of interpretive circulars on financial practices, as this asserts legislative oversight over the execution of laws within the sphere of commerce regulation. Such a resolution preserves the separation of powers by allowing Congress to check administrative interpretations while maintaining federal supremacy in enumerated domains. The subject matter pertains to the regulation of financial transactions among the states, properly within c…
The proposed resolution seeks to disapprove an executive agency rule concerning the internal operations of deposit accounts between private citizens and financial institutions, a matter not enumerated among the powers granted to Congress. Such regulation pertains to the ordinary police powers over contracts and personal property, which are reserved to the States or the people. Even if Congress presumes to oversee an agency's action in this sphere, it cannot confer upon itself authority exceeding the constitutional bounds, as the subject lies beyond the strict limits of federal legislative powe…
Congress holds all legislative powers granted by the Constitution and may enact resolutions to check administrative actions undertaken pursuant to statutes of its own making. This joint resolution of disapproval exercises Congress's authority to maintain legislative primacy over executive rulemaking in areas of federal regulation, such as financial protections incidental to commerce among the states, thereby preserving the separation of powers and preventing undue accumulation of authority in the executive branch.
Congress, vested with all legislative powers by Article I, Section 1, possesses the authority to enact measures supervising the execution of its own statutes by executive bureaus, such as the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection. The proposed joint resolution, functioning as a law requiring passage by both Houses and presentment to the President under Article I, Section 7, constitutes a valid exercise of this authority. As affirmed in McCulloch v. Maryland (1819), the necessary and proper clause empowers Congress to select appropriate means, including oversight of agencies created to implem…
Report an error in this Founders' Verdict
What should pass
“VFA SI Solution”
Archived SI output (machine-generated) · No editorial review recorded
This historical draft has no editorial review time on record. Check its claims against the original bill and current law.
Consumer Closed Account Protection Act
Generated by VFA SI Solutions
Block the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection from withdrawing its Circular 2023-02, which treats the unauthorized reopening of consumer-closed deposit accounts as an unfair practice, to maintain consumer protections in banking.
Bipartisan rationale: Democratic priorities: Codifies CFPB consumer protections against predatory account reopenings that lead to fees and debt; Republican priorities: Sunsets agency overreach, adds GAO oversight, limits scope to commerce, and preserves state authority per federalism.
Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 Amendment X
Report an error in this Solution
Citizen Consensus
“Do you support this VFA SI Solution?”
One vote per verified account; you can change it any time. Only verified accounts count, results publish once 30 verified people have voted, and state and district results count only people who attested a home ZIP code. How this works.
Email verification is not switched on yet, so no vote counts toward results yet. Votes cast now are saved and count once the voter verifies their email address.
Sign in or create a free account to vote.
Add a short reason (optional)
/280 · no links or contact details · reasons are reviewed before anyone sees them, and many never are shown.
Your vote is saved but held out of published results by an automated integrity check (for example, several accounts voting from one browser).
Your vote is saved. It will count once you verify your email address. Verify on your account page.
Your vote counts nationally. Add your home ZIP code to count in your state and district too.
Your vote counts nationally and in .
Reason saved privately; it is shown only if it passes review.
Verified participants nationwide · n =
Self-selected participants, not a random sample; ± is the 95% sampling margin.
Not enough verified votes yet. Results publish at verified votes.
A sudden surge of votes on this item was flagged and is under review; votes from new accounts in that surge are held out until it is resolved.
For journalists and bloggers
“Embed this grade”
Free to use with the link back. The badge and card update when the grade changes. Embed terms →