Real bill currently in Congress  c/o  SRES/119/817

An executive resolution authorizing the en bloc consideration in Executive Session of certain nominations on the Executive Calendar.

Policy area: Congress ▲ 36 days since action Sponsor: John Thune, SD-Senate, R → Congress.gov

Latest action (2026-07-30): Resolution agreed to in Senate without amendment by Yea-Nay Vote. 50 - 47. Record Vote Number: 217.

The Framers

“Founders’ Verdict”

CONDITIONAL

Confidence 0.75

Synthesis

The Senate may consider nominations en bloc as a procedural rule under Article I, Section 5, Clause 2, provided that each Senator retains the right to demand separate consideration and a recorded vote on any individual nomination, thereby preserving the deliberative duty inherent in the advice and consent power under Article II, Section 2, Clause 2.

Hamilton YES

The Senate possesses the constitutional authority to determine its own rules of proceeding, including the method by which it considers nominations. Article I, Section 5, Clause 2 grants each House the power to 'determine the Rules of its Proceedings.' The en bloc consideration of nominations in Executive Session is a procedural mechanism that does not infringe upon the President's appointment power under Article II, Section 2, Clause 2, which requires the advice and consent of the Senate. The Senate may expedite its business through such rules, as the Federalist No. 66 notes the Senate's role …

Article I, Section 5, Clause 2 Article II, Section 2, Clause 2 Federalist No. 66
Jefferson CONDITIONAL

The Constitution vests the Senate with the sole Power to advise and consent to nominations (Article II, Section 2, Clause 2). En bloc consideration of nominations may be permissible if it does not deprive Senators of their individual duty to deliberate on each nominee's fitness. However, if such a procedure is used to rush or obscure the examination of a nominee's character or qualifications, it would violate the spirit of the advice and consent clause, which requires a deliberate and informed judgment. The Tenth Amendment reserves to the States and the People all powers not delegated, and the…

Article II, Section 2, Clause 2 Amendment X
Madison YES

This resolution is a procedural rule of the Senate for considering nominations. The Constitution grants each House the authority to determine its own rules of proceedings, and the Senate's power to structure its advice and consent function includes the ability to consider nominations en bloc, provided each nominee is individually subject to the final vote. The cloture motion is a legitimate exercise of the Senate's control over debate and calendar management. Nothing in the Constitution requires that nominations be considered individually or in a specific order. Therefore, this action is consi…

Article I, Section 5, Clause 2 Article II, Section 2, Clause 2
Marshall YES

The Constitution vests in the Senate the sole Power to advise and consent to nominations, and Article I, Section 5 grants each House the authority to determine the Rules of its Proceedings. The en bloc consideration of nominations in Executive Session is a procedural rule that does not violate any express constitutional provision. As established in Marbury v. Madison, it is the duty of the judicial department to say what the law is, but here the action concerns internal legislative procedure, which is a political question committed to the Senate's discretion. The Necessary and Proper Clause (A…

Article I, Section 5, Clause 2 Article II, Section 2, Clause 2

What should pass

“AI Consensus Solution”

No solution yet

Daily synthesis runs at 06:00 UTC. This bill's consensus draft will appear on the next pass.

← Back to the Republic