S.Res. 695 explained  ·  119th Congress  ·  Pending in Congress

A resolution commemorating April 6, 2026, as the day the Artemis II crew surpassed the record for the farthest distance traveled by astronauts into deep space and celebrating the success of the Artemis II mission.

Create a free account or sign in to follow S.Res. 695 and get alerts. Policy area: Science, Technology, Communications Create a free account or sign in to follow the Science, Technology, Communications policy area and get alerts. ▲ 175 days since action Sponsor: Ted Cruz, TX-Senate, R → Congress.gov

Cosponsors: 1 (1 D, 0 R) · per Congress.gov, 2026-10-08

Introduced: 2026-04-28

Latest action (2026-04-28): Submitted in the Senate, considered, and agreed to without amendment and with a preamble by Unanimous Consent. (consideration: CR S2076-2077; text: CR S2085)

What S.Res. 695 does, in plain terms

The Congressional Research Service has not published a summary of S.Res. 695 yet. Its official title: “A resolution commemorating April 6, 2026, as the day the Artemis II crew surpassed the record for the farthest distance traveled by astronauts into deep space and celebrating the success of the Artemis II mission.”.

Constitution Index

“VFA Constitution grade”

Not graded yet

S.Res. 695 has not been graded yet. New measures with an official summary are graded daily under the published rubric.

The Framers

“Founders’ Verdict”

CONSTITUTIONAL

Confidence 1.00

Archived SI output (machine-generated)

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI verdict was machine-generated by software and predates the review desk; check it against the official bill text.

Synthesis

The Senate may adopt non-binding simple resolutions commemorating scientific achievements and missions as a legitimate exercise of its authority over internal proceedings, without enacting law, appropriating funds, or encroaching on other powers.

Hamilton YES

The Senate's adoption of a simple resolution to commemorate a scientific achievement and celebrate a mission's success constitutes a legitimate exercise of its authority to determine the rules of its proceedings and to express collective sentiments on matters of national import. Such non-binding expressions do not enact law, appropriate funds, or encroach upon executive functions, aligning with the republican principle of legislative dignity and deliberation. This power inheres in the Senate's constitutional structure, enabling it to recognize virtues in human endeavor without overstepping enu…

Article I, Section 5, Clause 2 Federalist No. 65
Jefferson YES

This resolution is a mere expression of the Senate's commendation for a scientific achievement, involving no appropriation of funds, no regulation of commerce, and no compulsion upon the people or states. It falls within the Senate's inherent authority to conduct its internal proceedings and voice collective sentiments, akin to resolutions of thanks or adjournments common in the founding era. Such actions do not expand federal power beyond enumerated limits, preserving individual liberty and state sovereignty by imposing no burdens. Strict construction demands we distinguish this ceremonial sp…

Article I, Section 5, Clause 2 Amendment X
Madison YES

The proposed resolution is a simple Senate resolution that merely commemorates a date and celebrates an achievement in exploration, without appropriating funds, imposing mandates, or exercising substantive legislative power over the people. Such expressions fall within the inherent authority of each House to conduct its proceedings, including the adoption of non-binding resolutions that reflect the sense of the body. This does not extend beyond the careful limits of enumerated powers, as it neither regulates commerce nor taxes, but serves the internal order and dignity of the Senate.

Article I, Section 5 Federalist No. 51
Marshall YES

The Congress possesses authority under the Constitution to commemorate achievements in science, as such resolutions fall within the implied powers necessary and proper to the enumerated power to promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts. This non-binding expression of the Senate, agreed to by unanimous consent, pertains to the internal proceedings of that body and does not usurp executive functions or infringe upon individual rights. Judicial review, as established in Marbury v. Madison, upholds the supremacy of the Constitution but does not invalidate mere commendatory actions incidenta…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 8 Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 (as interpreted in McCulloch v. Maryland (1819))
Report an error in this Founders' Verdict
No account needed. Or email hello@valuesforamerica.com. How reports are handled.

What should pass

“VFA SI Solution”

No solution yet

A sourced SI draft appears here once it passes automated checks (Constitution citation, source verification, independent SI critic). How publication works.

Share card

1200×675 PNG for X, Threads, LinkedIn and messages. Free to share with a link back to this page.

For journalists and bloggers

“Embed this grade”

Free to use with the link back. The badge and card update when the grade changes. Embed terms →

VFA Constitution grade for S.Res. 695

← Back to the Republic