S.J.Res. 137 explained  ·  119th Congress  ·  Pending in Congress

A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign military sale to the Government of Israel of certain defense articles and services.

Create a free account or sign in to follow S.J.Res. 137 and get alerts. Policy area: International Affairs Create a free account or sign in to follow the International Affairs policy area and get alerts. ▲ 214 days since action Sponsor: Bernie Sanders, VT-Senate, I → Congress.gov

Cosponsors: 3 (3 D, 0 R) · per Congress.gov, 2026-10-09

Introduced: 2026-03-19

Latest action (2026-03-19): Read twice and referred to the Committee on Foreign Relations.

What S.J.Res. 137 does, in plain terms

The Congressional Research Service has not published a summary of S.J.Res. 137 yet. Its official title: “A joint resolution providing for congressional disapproval of the proposed foreign military sale to the Government of Israel of certain defense articles and services.”.

Constitution Index

“VFA Constitution grade”

Not graded yet

S.J.Res. 137 has not been graded yet. New measures with an official summary are graded daily under the published rubric.

The Framers

“Founders’ Verdict”

CONSTITUTIONAL

Confidence 1.00

Archived SI output (machine-generated)

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI verdict was machine-generated by software and predates the review desk; check it against the official bill text.

Synthesis

Congress may constitutionally disapprove specific proposed foreign military sales via joint resolution under its enumerated power to regulate commerce with foreign nations (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3), supplemented by powers to provide for the common defense and necessary and proper clause, serving as a legitimate check on executive action without encroaching on core foreign affairs functions.

Hamilton YES

The power to regulate commerce with foreign nations vests in Congress, and the export of defense articles and services falls within this domain as a form of commercial intercourse with foreign powers. A joint resolution disapproving a specific proposed sale constitutes a legitimate legislative act to direct such commerce, consistent with the principles of republican government where the legislature holds primacy in matters of commerce and military establishments. This does not infringe upon the executive's conduct of foreign affairs, as it operates through general legislative authority rather …

Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 Federalist No. 11
Jefferson YES

The Congress possesses the enumerated power to regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, which encompasses the disposition of arms and military articles to foreign governments. This joint resolution exercises that authority by disapproving a specific proposed sale, thereby checking potential executive overreach in foreign military transactions. Such action aligns with strict construction, as the power is delegated to Congress and not reserved to the executive alone. The Tenth Amendment reinforces that undelegated powers remain with the States or the people, but here the power is clearly federal …

Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 Amendment X
Madison YES

The proposed joint resolution falls within Congress's enumerated powers to regulate commerce with foreign nations and to provide for the common defense, as the sale of defense articles constitutes an aspect of foreign commerce subject to legislative oversight. Such a resolution, if enacted, serves as a check on executive implementation of statutes authorizing arms exports, preserving the balance of powers without exceeding constitutional bounds. This aligns with the careful distribution of authority to prevent any department from usurping the province of another.

Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 Federalist No. 41
Marshall YES

The Congress possesses the enumerated power to regulate Commerce with foreign Nations, which encompasses the export of defense articles and services. A joint resolution disapproving a proposed foreign military sale is a legitimate legislative act plainly adapted to the execution of this power and the power to provide for the common Defence. Such means are necessary and proper for Congress to carry into effect its constitutional authority over foreign commerce and military regulation, without encroaching upon the executive's incidental foreign affairs functions, as the Constitution vests primar…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 McCulloch v. Maryland (1819) Gibbons v. Ogden (1824)
Report an error in this Founders' Verdict
No account needed. Or email hello@valuesforamerica.com. How reports are handled.

What should pass

“VFA SI Solution”

No solution yet

A sourced SI draft appears here once it passes automated checks (Constitution citation, source verification, independent SI critic). How publication works.

Share card

1200×675 PNG for X, Threads, LinkedIn and messages. Free to share with a link back to this page.

For journalists and bloggers

“Embed this grade”

Free to use with the link back. The badge and card update when the grade changes. Embed terms →

VFA Constitution grade for S.J.Res. 137

← Back to the Republic