S. 4124 explained  ·  119th Congress  ·  Pending in Congress

A bill to prohibit funds made available to the Department of Justice from being used to make a personal payment to the President in connection with a claim that is subject to the Federal Tort Claims Act, whether in the form of a settlement or any other payment from the Judgment Fund for the personal benefit of the President.

Create a free account or sign in to follow S. 4124 and get alerts. Policy area: Law Create a free account or sign in to follow the Law policy area and get alerts. ▲ 215 days since action Sponsor: Chuck Schumer, NY-Senate, D → Congress.gov

Cosponsors: none · per Congress.gov, 2026-10-09

Introduced: 2026-03-17

Latest action (2026-03-18): Read the second time. Placed on Senate Legislative Calendar under General Orders. Calendar No. 359.

What S. 4124 does, in plain terms

The Congressional Research Service has not published a summary of S. 4124 yet. Its official title: “A bill to prohibit funds made available to the Department of Justice from being used to make a personal payment to the President in connection with a claim that is subject to the Federal Tort Claims Act, whether in the form of a settlement or any other payment from the Judgment Fund for the personal benefit of the President.”.

Constitution Index

“VFA Constitution grade”

Not graded yet

S. 4124 has not been graded yet. New measures with an official summary are graded daily under the published rubric.

The Framers

“Founders’ Verdict”

CONSTITUTIONAL

Confidence 1.00

Archived SI output (machine-generated)

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI verdict was machine-generated by software and predates the review desk; check it against the official bill text.

Synthesis

Unanimous affirmation of Congress's exclusive authority over appropriations, prohibiting use of public funds (including DOJ allocations and Judgment Fund) for personal payments to the President under tort claims, upholding separation of powers and public fisc integrity.

Hamilton YES

Congress possesses the exclusive authority to control the appropriation and expenditure of public funds, ensuring that no money is drawn from the Treasury without its explicit direction. This bill merely exercises that prerogative by prohibiting the use of funds allocated to the Department of Justice—or disbursed from the Judgment Fund—for personal payments to the President under tort claims against the government. Such a restriction aligns with the principles of republican government, preventing the misuse of public moneys for private benefit and maintaining separation of powers by subordinat…

Article I, Section 9, Clause 7 Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 Federalist No. 30 Federalist No. 33
Jefferson YES

The Congress possesses the sole prerogative to direct the appropriation of public monies from the Treasury, ensuring that funds are drawn only in consequence of laws it enacts, and may thus prohibit their use for personal payments to the President, thereby safeguarding the public fisc from improper diversion and upholding the reserved powers of the people against unauthorized federal expenditure.

Article I, Section 9, Clause 7 Amendment X
Madison YES

The proposed bill exercises the legislative authority to control the appropriation and disbursement of public funds, a vital check against potential executive overreach or misuse. By prohibiting the use of funds allocated to the Department of Justice for personal payments to the President from the Judgment Fund under tort claims, it ensures that monies drawn from the Treasury serve public purposes rather than private benefit, aligning with the principles of limited government and separation of powers. This restraint prevents the fusion of public revenue with personal emolument, guarding agains…

Article I, Section 9, Clause 7 Federalist No. 58
Marshall YES

The Congress possesses the sole authority to determine the disposition of public funds drawn from the Treasury, as this bill imposes a condition upon the use of appropriated moneys by the Department of Justice, prohibiting their application to personal payments benefiting the President under claims governed by statute. Such a restriction is a legitimate exercise of legislative power, impliedly necessary and proper to the enumerated powers of taxation and appropriation, ensuring that public funds serve public purposes rather than private benefit. This does not encroach upon the executive vestin…

Article I, Section 9, Clause 7 Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)
Report an error in this Founders' Verdict
No account needed. Or email hello@valuesforamerica.com. How reports are handled.

What should pass

“VFA SI Solution”

No solution yet

A sourced SI draft appears here once it passes automated checks (Constitution citation, source verification, independent SI critic). How publication works.

Share card

1200×675 PNG for X, Threads, LinkedIn and messages. Free to share with a link back to this page.

For journalists and bloggers

“Embed this grade”

Free to use with the link back. The badge and card update when the grade changes. Embed terms →

VFA Constitution grade for S. 4124

← Back to the Republic