H.R. 9989 explained  ·  119th Congress  ·  Pending in Congress

CITE Act of 2026

Create a free account or sign in to follow H.R. 9989 and get alerts. Policy area: Government Operations and Politics Create a free account or sign in to follow the Government Operations and Politics policy area and get alerts. ▲ 82 days since action Sponsor: Ryan Mackenzie, PA-07, R → Congress.gov

Cosponsors: none · per Congress.gov, 2026-10-14

Introduced: 2026-07-30

Latest action (2026-07-30): Referred to the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, and in addition to the Committee on House Administration, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

What H.R. 9989 does, in plain terms

The Congressional Research Service has not published a summary of H.R. 9989 yet. Its official title: “CITE Act of 2026”.

Constitution Index

“VFA Constitution grade”

Not graded yet

H.R. 9989 has not been graded yet. New measures with an official summary are graded daily under the published rubric.

The Framers

“Founders’ Verdict”

CONDITIONAL

Confidence 0.50

Archived SI output (machine-generated)

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI verdict was machine-generated by software and predates the review desk; check it against the official bill text.

Synthesis

The Founders are evenly divided (2-2). Hamilton and Marshall argue the bill is constitutional under the Necessary and Proper Clause and Elections Clause, while Madison and Jefferson contend it imposes additional qualifications and infringes on reserved rights. The bill may be constitutional if carefully applied to avoid overreach and protect property rights.

Hamilton YES

This bill is constitutional under the Necessary and Proper Clause, as it is a means to ensure the integrity of the federal government and prevent corruption or conflicts of interest among federal officers. Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 grants Congress the power to make all laws necessary and proper for carrying into execution the powers vested in the federal government. Additionally, Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 allows Congress to regulate the qualifications and conduct of federal officers, including the President, to preserve the public trust. The requirement to divest or place securitie…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 Article II, Section 1, Clause 5 Federalist No. 65
Jefferson NO

The Constitution does not grant Congress the authority to impose additional qualifications for federal office beyond those specified in Article I and Article II. Requiring candidates to divest or place securities in a blind trust infringes upon the right to private property, which is protected by the Ninth Amendment, and exceeds the enumerated powers of Congress, as reserved by the Tenth Amendment. The Necessary and Proper Clause cannot justify such an expansion of federal power, as it is not tethered to any specific constitutional grant. This bill would improperly restrict the liberty of indi…

Amendment X Amendment IX Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 Article I, Section 2 Article I, Section 3 Article II, Section 1
Madison NO

The Constitution prescribes fixed qualifications for federal office in Article I, Section 2, Clause 2 and Article I, Section 3, Clause 3, and Article II, Section 1, Clause 5. Congress may not add to these qualifications by statute. Requiring divestiture of securities or placement in a blind trust imposes a new condition on candidacy that is not among the enumerated qualifications. While Congress has authority over the times, places, and manner of elections under Article I, Section 4, Clause 1, this power does not extend to altering the essential qualifications for office. The Federalist Papers…

Article I, Section 2, Clause 2 Article I, Section 4, Clause 1 Federalist No. 52 Federalist No. 57
Marshall YES

This bill is a constitutional exercise of Congress's power to regulate the manner of federal elections. The Elections Clause (Article I, Section 4, Clause 1) grants Congress authority to prescribe the times, places, and manner of holding elections for Senators and Representatives, and by extension, the manner of candidacy. Requiring candidates to divest or place securities in a blind trust upon filing is a reasonable regulation to prevent conflicts of interest and preserve the integrity of the electoral process. The Necessary and Proper Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 18) empowers Congres…

Article I, Section 4, Clause 1 Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)
Report an error in this Founders' Verdict
No account needed. Or email hello@valuesforamerica.com. How reports are handled.

What should pass

“VFA SI Solution”

No solution yet

A sourced SI draft appears here once it passes automated checks (Constitution citation, source verification, independent SI critic). How publication works.

Share card

1200×675 PNG for X, Threads, LinkedIn and messages. Free to share with a link back to this page.

For journalists and bloggers

“Embed this grade”

Free to use with the link back. The badge and card update when the grade changes. Embed terms →

VFA Constitution grade for H.R. 9989

← Back to the Republic