H.R. 9792 explained  ·  119th Congress  ·  Pending in Congress

Employee Ownership Fairness Act of 2026

Create a free account or sign in to follow H.R. 9792 and get alerts. Policy area: Labor and Employment Create a free account or sign in to follow the Labor and Employment policy area and get alerts. ▲ 92 days since action Sponsor: Scott Perry, PA-10, R → Congress.gov

Cosponsors: none · per Congress.gov, 2026-10-15

Introduced: 2026-07-20

Latest action (2026-07-20): Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

What H.R. 9792 does, in plain terms

The Congressional Research Service has not published a summary of H.R. 9792 yet. Its official title: “Employee Ownership Fairness Act of 2026”.

Constitution Index

“VFA Constitution grade”

Not graded yet

H.R. 9792 has not been graded yet. New measures with an official summary are graded daily under the published rubric.

The Framers

“Founders’ Verdict”

CONSTITUTIONAL

Confidence 0.75

Archived SI output (machine-generated)

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI verdict was machine-generated by software and predates the review desk; check it against the official bill text.

Synthesis

The bill is constitutional under the Commerce Clause and Necessary and Proper Clause, as amending ERISA is a valid exercise of Congress's power to regulate employee benefit plans that substantially affect interstate commerce, and it respects federal supremacy, separation of powers, and state sovereignty.

Hamilton YES

This bill is constitutional under the Commerce Clause and the Necessary and Proper Clause. Congress has the authority to regulate employee benefit plans that affect interstate commerce, as established in Article I, Section 8, Clause 3. The amendment to ERISA is a proper exercise of this power to promote economic stability and retirement security, which are objects of general welfare. The bill does not infringe upon state powers reserved by the Tenth Amendment, as ERISA preempts state law in this field to ensure uniformity, consistent with the supremacy of federal law under Article VI, Clause 2…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 Article VI, Clause 2 Federalist No. 23 Federalist No. 33
Jefferson CONDITIONAL

This bill, by amending a federal statute to regulate the internal operations of private retirement plans, must be examined under the limited, enumerated powers of the federal government. The Constitution vests Congress with authority over interstate commerce, but the Tenth Amendment reserves to the states all powers not specifically delegated. The regulation of trusts, estates, and private contracts has traditionally fallen within the police powers of the several states. Therefore, this legislation is constitutional only if it can be shown to be a necessary and proper exercise of the Commerce …

Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 Amendment X
Madison YES

This bill amends the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, a federal statute regulating employee benefit plans. Such legislation falls within the powers granted to Congress under the Commerce Clause, as employee benefit plans substantially affect interstate commerce. Additionally, the bill is consistent with the taxing and spending power, as ERISA is closely tied to federal tax incentives for retirement savings. The amendment does not exceed the enumerated powers of the federal government and respects the limits of federal authority as outlined in the Federalist Papers. The bill doe…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 Federalist No. 45
Marshall YES

This bill is constitutional as it falls within the enumerated powers of Congress to regulate commerce among the several states and to provide for the general welfare through taxation and spending. The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 is a valid exercise of Congress's power under the Commerce Clause, as employee benefit plans substantially affect interstate commerce. The proposed amendment merely adjusts the terms of such plans, which is a permissible regulation of commercial activity. Furthermore, the Necessary and Proper Clause authorizes Congress to make laws that are appropri…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 (Commerce Clause) Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 (Necessary and Proper Clause)
Report an error in this Founders' Verdict
No account needed. Or email hello@valuesforamerica.com. How reports are handled.

What should pass

“VFA SI Solution”

No solution yet

A sourced SI draft appears here once it passes automated checks (Constitution citation, source verification, independent SI critic). How publication works.

Share card

1200×675 PNG for X, Threads, LinkedIn and messages. Free to share with a link back to this page.

For journalists and bloggers

“Embed this grade”

Free to use with the link back. The badge and card update when the grade changes. Embed terms →

VFA Constitution grade for H.R. 9792

← Back to the Republic