Real bill currently in Congress  c/o  HR/119/9792

Employee Ownership Fairness Act of 2026

Policy area: Labor and Employment ▲ 46 days since action Sponsor: Scott Perry, PA-10, R → Congress.gov

Latest action (2026-07-20): Referred to the Committee on Ways and Means, and in addition to the Committee on Education and Workforce, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in each case for consideration of such provisions as fall within the jurisdiction of the committee concerned.

The Framers

“Founders’ Verdict”

CONSTITUTIONAL

Confidence 0.75

Synthesis

The bill is constitutional under the Commerce Clause and Necessary and Proper Clause, as amending ERISA is a valid exercise of Congress's power to regulate employee benefit plans that substantially affect interstate commerce, and it respects federal supremacy, separation of powers, and state sovereignty.

Hamilton YES

This bill is constitutional under the Commerce Clause and the Necessary and Proper Clause. Congress has the authority to regulate employee benefit plans that affect interstate commerce, as established in Article I, Section 8, Clause 3. The amendment to ERISA is a proper exercise of this power to promote economic stability and retirement security, which are objects of general welfare. The bill does not infringe upon state powers reserved by the Tenth Amendment, as ERISA preempts state law in this field to ensure uniformity, consistent with the supremacy of federal law under Article VI, Clause 2…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 Article VI, Clause 2 Federalist No. 23 Federalist No. 33
Jefferson CONDITIONAL

This bill, by amending a federal statute to regulate the internal operations of private retirement plans, must be examined under the limited, enumerated powers of the federal government. The Constitution vests Congress with authority over interstate commerce, but the Tenth Amendment reserves to the states all powers not specifically delegated. The regulation of trusts, estates, and private contracts has traditionally fallen within the police powers of the several states. Therefore, this legislation is constitutional only if it can be shown to be a necessary and proper exercise of the Commerce …

Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 Amendment X
Madison YES

This bill amends the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, a federal statute regulating employee benefit plans. Such legislation falls within the powers granted to Congress under the Commerce Clause, as employee benefit plans substantially affect interstate commerce. Additionally, the bill is consistent with the taxing and spending power, as ERISA is closely tied to federal tax incentives for retirement savings. The amendment does not exceed the enumerated powers of the federal government and respects the limits of federal authority as outlined in the Federalist Papers. The bill doe…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 Federalist No. 45
Marshall YES

This bill is constitutional as it falls within the enumerated powers of Congress to regulate commerce among the several states and to provide for the general welfare through taxation and spending. The Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 is a valid exercise of Congress's power under the Commerce Clause, as employee benefit plans substantially affect interstate commerce. The proposed amendment merely adjusts the terms of such plans, which is a permissible regulation of commercial activity. Furthermore, the Necessary and Proper Clause authorizes Congress to make laws that are appropri…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 (Commerce Clause) Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 (Necessary and Proper Clause)

What should pass

“AI Consensus Solution”

No solution yet

Daily synthesis runs at 06:00 UTC. This bill's consensus draft will appear on the next pass.

← Back to the Republic