H.R. 8663 explained · 119th Congress · Pending in Congress
Fair Pay Act of 2026
Cosponsors: none · per Congress.gov, 2026-10-14
Introduced: 2026-05-04
Latest action (2026-05-04): Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.
What H.R. 8663 does, in plain terms
The Congressional Research Service has not published a summary of H.R. 8663 yet. Its official title: “Fair Pay Act of 2026”.
Constitution Index
“VFA Constitution grade”
Not graded yet
H.R. 8663 has not been graded yet. New measures with an official summary are graded daily under the published rubric.
The Framers
“Founders’ Verdict”
Confidence 0.50
Archived SI output (machine-generated)No editorial review recorded. This historical SI verdict was machine-generated by software and predates the review desk; check it against the official bill text.
Synthesis
2-2 split: Hamilton and Marshall (CONSTITUTIONAL under Commerce Clause with limits); Madison and Jefferson (UNCONSTITUTIONAL as state intrusion)
The power to regulate commerce among the several States vests in Congress the authority to address practices in enterprises engaged therein that burden or obstruct such commerce, including discriminatory wage payments which distort labor markets and impede the free flow of commerce essential to the Union. Amending existing labor standards legislation to prohibit such discrimination falls squarely within this enumerated power and the necessary means to execute it, as a vigorous federal regulation of commerce is indispensable to national prosperity and unity against the weaknesses of state paroc…
The proposed amendment to the Fair Labor Standards Act seeks to regulate private wage agreements between employers and employees on the basis of sex, race, or national origin. Such regulation exceeds the enumerated powers of Congress, as no provision in the Constitution grants the federal government authority over intrastate labor contracts or private associations. These matters pertain to individual liberty and the reserved powers of the states or the people, as affirmed by the Tenth Amendment. The Commerce Clause empowers Congress to regulate commerce among the states, but it does not extend…
The proposed amendment to the Fair Labor Standards Act seeks to prohibit discrimination in the payment of wages on account of sex, race, or national origin. While Congress possesses the enumerated power to regulate Commerce among the several States, this measure exceeds that authority by intruding upon the regulation of private contracts and labor relations, which are not interstate commerce but matters of local police power reserved to the States. Such prohibitions dictate the terms of compensation based on personal characteristics, extending federal authority into the indefinite powers of th…
The proposed amendment to the Fair Labor Standards Act, prohibiting discrimination in wage payments on account of sex, race, or national origin, falls within Congress's enumerated power to regulate Commerce among the several States, as granted by Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 of the Constitution. In Gibbons v. Ogden (1824), this Court held that commerce comprehends not merely traffic but intercourse for purposes of trade, extending to economic activities substantially affecting interstate exchange, such as employment contracts and wage structures. The regulation of wages to prevent discrimina…
Report an error in this Founders' Verdict
What should pass
“VFA SI Solution”
Archived SI output (machine-generated) · No editorial review recorded
This historical draft has no editorial review time on record. Check its claims against the original bill and current law.
Interstate Fair Pay Standards Act
Generated by VFA SI Solutions
Prohibit discrimination in wage payments based on sex, race, or national origin by amending the Fair Labor Standards Act.
Bipartisan rationale: Honors Democratic priorities of expanding pay equity protections for women and minorities with strong remedies; honors Republican priorities of strict limits to Commerce Clause enterprises only (excluding small/intrastate businesses and states), low-cost enforcement cap, sunset for review, and no new mandates on non-federal actors.
Report an error in this Solution
Citizen Consensus
“Do you support this VFA SI Solution?”
One vote per verified account; you can change it any time. Only verified accounts count, results publish once 30 verified people have voted, and state and district results count only people who attested a home ZIP code. How this works.
Email verification is not switched on yet, so no vote counts toward results yet. Votes cast now are saved and count once the voter verifies their email address.
Sign in or create a free account to vote.
Add a short reason (optional)
/280 · no links or contact details · reasons are reviewed before anyone sees them, and many never are shown.
Your vote is saved but held out of published results by an automated integrity check (for example, several accounts voting from one browser).
Your vote is saved. It will count once you verify your email address. Verify on your account page.
Your vote counts nationally. Add your home ZIP code to count in your state and district too.
Your vote counts nationally and in .
Reason saved privately; it is shown only if it passes review.
Verified participants nationwide · n =
Self-selected participants, not a random sample; ± is the 95% sampling margin.
Not enough verified votes yet. Results publish at verified votes.
A sudden surge of votes on this item was flagged and is under review; votes from new accounts in that surge are held out until it is resolved.
For journalists and bloggers
“Embed this grade”
Free to use with the link back. The badge and card update when the grade changes. Embed terms →