Real bill currently in Congress  c/o  HR/119/7332

Whale CHARTS Act of 2026

Policy area: Environmental Protection ▲ 7 days since action Sponsor: Doris O. Matsui, CA-07, D → Congress.gov

Latest action (2026-07-14): Referred to the Subcommittee on Water, Wildlife and Fisheries.

The Framers

“Founders’ Verdict”

CONDITIONAL

Confidence 0.75

Synthesis

The Whale CHARTS Act of 2026 is constitutional only if its provisions are narrowly tied to an enumerated federal power, specifically the Commerce Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3) or a valid treaty; if it regulates purely intrastate activities without substantial effect on interstate commerce or federal property, it would violate the Tenth Amendment.

Hamilton CONDITIONAL

The Whale CHARTS Act of 2026, as a federal environmental protection measure, must be grounded in a specific constitutional grant of power. The most plausible basis is the Commerce Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3), which empowers Congress to regulate commerce with foreign nations and among the several states. Whales, being migratory and often involved in interstate or foreign commerce (e.g., whale watching, fishing, or maritime trade), may fall within this authority if the regulated activities substantially affect such commerce. However, if the bill extends to purely intrastate activitie…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 Federalist No. 23
Jefferson NO

The Whale CHARTS Act of 2026 represents an exercise of federal power over environmental matters not enumerated in the Constitution. The Tenth Amendment expressly reserves to the States or to the people all powers not delegated to the United States, and the Ninth Amendment affirms that the enumeration of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people. Regulation of whales and their habitats, absent a direct link to interstate commerce, treaties, or other delegated powers, falls within the reserved domain of the States. This bill intrudes upon that spher…

Amendment X Amendment IX
Madison CONDITIONAL

The constitutionality of the Whale CHARTS Act of 2026 depends entirely on whether its specific provisions fall within the enumerated powers of the federal government. Environmental protection is not a power expressly delegated to Congress in the Constitution. To be valid, the bill must be tied to a enumerated power such as the regulation of interstate commerce (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3) or the management of federal property or territorial waters (Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2). If the act merely charts whale populations without a direct link to commerce or federal domain, it would intr…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 Article IV, Section 3, Clause 2 Federalist No. 45
Marshall YES

The Constitution vests in Congress the power to regulate commerce among the several states. In Gibbons v. Ogden, this Court established that commerce includes all commercial intercourse, and that the federal power over such commerce is plenary. Whales, as migratory creatures that traverse state and national boundaries and are subject to harvest and trade, fall within the sphere of interstate commerce. Moreover, under McCulloch v. Maryland, Congress may employ all means which are appropriate and plainly adapted to a legitimate end. The Whale CHARTS Act, by protecting a resource that affects com…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 Gibbons v. Ogden (1824) McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)

What should pass

“AI Consensus Solution”

No solution yet

Daily synthesis runs at 06:00 UTC. This bill's consensus draft will appear on the next pass.

← Back to the Republic