H.R. 10134 explained  ·  119th Congress  ·  Pending in Congress

Local Health Care Protection Act of 2026

Create a free account or sign in to follow H.R. 10134 and get alerts. Policy area: Health Create a free account or sign in to follow the Health policy area and get alerts. ▲ 61 days since action Sponsor: Hillary J. Scholten, MI-03, D → Congress.gov

Cosponsors: none · per Congress.gov, 2026-10-14

Introduced: 2026-08-20

Latest action (2026-08-20): Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

What H.R. 10134 does, in plain terms

The Congressional Research Service has not published a summary of H.R. 10134 yet. Its official title: “Local Health Care Protection Act of 2026”.

Constitution Index

“VFA Constitution grade”

Not graded yet

H.R. 10134 has not been graded yet. New measures with an official summary are graded daily under the published rubric.

The Framers

“Founders’ Verdict”

CONDITIONAL

Confidence 0.75

Archived SI output (machine-generated)

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI verdict was machine-generated by software and predates the review desk; check it against the official bill text.

Synthesis

The bill is constitutional only if modified to include clear, objective criteria for the exception, preserve the integrity of the federal drug discount program, avoid coercion of states, and respect state autonomy under the Tenth Amendment. The exception must be narrowly tailored to a legitimate federal interest and not impair existing contractual obligations.

Hamilton CONDITIONAL

The proposed bill seeks to create an exception to a federal drug discount program based on cuts to Medicaid. Under Article I, Section 8, Clause 1, Congress has the power to provide for the general welfare, but this power must be exercised in a manner consistent with the Supremacy Clause (Article VI, Clause 2) and the constitutional structure of federalism. The bill's conditionality on Medicaid cuts raises concerns about undermining the uniformity of federal programs and potentially infringing on state prerogatives in administering Medicaid, as states retain significant authority under the Tent…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 Article VI, Clause 2 Tenth Amendment Article I, Section 10, Clause 1 Federalist No. 33 Federalist No. 45
Jefferson NO

This bill, by establishing an eligibility exception for a drug discount program based on cuts to the Medicaid program, represents an unwarranted federal intrusion into matters reserved to the states. The Constitution grants Congress only enumerated powers, and the regulation of Medicaid—a cooperative state-federal program—is not among them. The Tenth Amendment expressly reserves to the states all powers not delegated to the United States, and the Ninth Amendment further affirms that the people retain rights not enumerated. The federal government may attach conditions to its spending, but it ca…

Amendment X Amendment IX Article I, Section 8
Madison CONDITIONAL

The constitutionality of this bill depends on whether the eligibility exception for the drug discount program falls within Congress's enumerated powers and respects the reserved powers of the states. Under the Spending Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 1), Congress may attach conditions to federal funds, but such conditions must be unambiguous, related to the federal interest, and not unduly coercive. The Commerce Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3) may also authorize regulation of drug discount programs if they substantially affect interstate commerce. However, because the bill respond…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 (Spending Clause) Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 (Commerce Clause) Tenth Amendment Federalist No. 45 (Madison, on limited federal powers) Federalist No. 39 (Madison, on the federal character of the Constitution)
Marshall YES

This bill, by establishing an eligibility exception within the federal drug discount program for those affected by Medicaid cuts, falls within the broad powers of Congress to provide for the general welfare and to regulate commerce. The Constitution grants Congress the authority to lay and collect taxes and to spend for the general welfare, and to make all laws necessary and proper for executing its enumerated powers. The modification of eligibility criteria for a federal program is a permissible exercise of that authority, particularly when the program is intertwined with the broader Medicaid…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 (Spending for General Welfare) Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 (Necessary and Proper Clause) McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)
Report an error in this Founders' Verdict
No account needed. Or email hello@valuesforamerica.com. How reports are handled.

What should pass

“VFA SI Solution”

No solution yet

A sourced SI draft appears here once it passes automated checks (Constitution citation, source verification, independent SI critic). How publication works.

Share card

1200×675 PNG for X, Threads, LinkedIn and messages. Free to share with a link back to this page.

For journalists and bloggers

“Embed this grade”

Free to use with the link back. The badge and card update when the grade changes. Embed terms →

VFA Constitution grade for H.R. 10134

← Back to the Republic