H.R. 10091 explained · 119th Congress · Pending in Congress
Mueller-Keating Memorial Highway Act
Cosponsors: none · per Congress.gov, 2026-10-14
Introduced: 2026-08-13
Latest action (2026-08-13): Referred to the House Committee on Transportation and Infrastructure.
What H.R. 10091 does, in plain terms
The Congressional Research Service has not published a summary of H.R. 10091 yet. Its official title: “Mueller-Keating Memorial Highway Act”.
Constitution Index
“VFA Constitution grade”
Not graded yet
H.R. 10091 has not been graded yet. New measures with an official summary are graded daily under the published rubric.
The Framers
“Founders’ Verdict”
Confidence 0.75
Archived SI output (machine-generated)No editorial review recorded. This historical SI verdict was machine-generated by software and predates the review desk; check it against the official bill text.
Synthesis
The bill is constitutional only if the highway in question is part of the federal interstate system or federal property, with a clear connection to Congress's enumerated powers over interstate commerce or post roads; otherwise, it risks exceeding federal authority and encroaching on state powers reserved by the Tenth Amendment.
The designation of a federal highway is a proper exercise of Congress's power under Article I, Section 8, Clause 7 to establish post roads and under the Commerce Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3) to regulate interstate commerce. The federal government has a clear interest in maintaining and naming the national highway system to facilitate commerce and travel among the states, as argued in Federalist No. 11 regarding the advantages of a unified commercial system. This action does not infringe on state powers reserved by the Tenth Amendment, as it merely names a road within the federal int…
This bill proposes to designate a federal highway, which implies a federal role in internal improvements and roadways. The Constitution grants no express power to the Congress for such purposes; the Tenth Amendment reserves all powers not delegated to the United States to the States or the people. Furthermore, the General Welfare Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 1) cannot be stretched to authorize such local projects, as this would consolidate power in the federal government and undermine the sovereignty of the states. The Bill of Rights, particularly the Ninth Amendment, reminds us that t…
The power to designate highways is not expressly enumerated in the Constitution, but may be implied under the power to regulate interstate commerce (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3) if the highway in question is part of a system that facilitates commerce among the several states. However, the mere naming of a highway, without a clear connection to an enumerated power, risks exceeding the limited and delegated authority of the federal government. As I argued in Federalist No. 45, the powers delegated to the federal government are few and defined, while those reserved to the states are numerous a…
This bill, which designates a federal highway, falls squarely within the enumerated power of Congress to establish post roads and regulate commerce among the several states. The Constitution grants Congress authority over post roads in Article I, Section 8, Clause 7, and the power to regulate interstate commerce under Article I, Section 8, Clause 3. As established in Gibbons v. Ogden (1824), the power to regulate commerce includes the authority over the channels of interstate commerce, which encompasses highways used for such commerce. Furthermore, the designation of a highway is a proper exer…
Report an error in this Founders' Verdict
What should pass
“VFA SI Solution”
Archived SI output (machine-generated) · No editorial review recorded
This historical draft has no editorial review time on record. Check its claims against the original bill and current law.
Memorial Highway Designation Cost Control and Consent Act
Generated by VFA SI Solutions
To honor the public service of Officer Mueller and Sergeant Keating by naming a segment of the federal highway system after them.
Bipartisan rationale: Honors Democratic priorities of commemorating public safety officers and investing in symbolic recognition of community heroes. Honors Republican priorities of limiting federal mandates, respecting state consent and fiscal restraint, and avoiding new spending or unfunded obligations.
Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 Amendment X
Report an error in this Solution
Citizen Consensus
“Do you support this VFA SI Solution?”
One vote per verified account; you can change it any time. Only verified accounts count, results publish once 30 verified people have voted, and state and district results count only people who attested a home ZIP code. How this works.
Email verification is not switched on yet, so no vote counts toward results yet. Votes cast now are saved and count once the voter verifies their email address.
Sign in or create a free account to vote.
Add a short reason (optional)
/280 · no links or contact details · reasons are reviewed before anyone sees them, and many never are shown.
Your vote is saved but held out of published results by an automated integrity check (for example, several accounts voting from one browser).
Your vote is saved. It will count once you verify your email address. Verify on your account page.
Your vote counts nationally. Add your home ZIP code to count in your state and district too.
Your vote counts nationally and in .
Reason saved privately; it is shown only if it passes review.
Verified participants nationwide · n =
Self-selected participants, not a random sample; ± is the 95% sampling margin.
Not enough verified votes yet. Results publish at verified votes.
A sudden surge of votes on this item was flagged and is under review; votes from new accounts in that surge are held out until it is resolved.
For journalists and bloggers
“Embed this grade”
Free to use with the link back. The badge and card update when the grade changes. Embed terms →