H.R. 10005 explained  ·  119th Congress  ·  Pending in Congress

Data Center Resource Disclosure Act

Create a free account or sign in to follow H.R. 10005 and get alerts. Policy area: Science, Technology, Communications Create a free account or sign in to follow the Science, Technology, Communications policy area and get alerts. ▲ 82 days since action Sponsor: Hillary J. Scholten, MI-03, D → Congress.gov

Cosponsors: 3 (3 D, 0 R) · per Congress.gov, 2026-10-14

Introduced: 2026-07-30

Latest action (2026-07-30): Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

What H.R. 10005 does, in plain terms

The Congressional Research Service has not published a summary of H.R. 10005 yet. Its official title: “Data Center Resource Disclosure Act”.

Constitution Index

“VFA Constitution grade”

Not graded yet

H.R. 10005 has not been graded yet. New measures with an official summary are graded daily under the published rubric.

The Framers

“Founders’ Verdict”

CONDITIONAL

Confidence 0.75

Archived SI output (machine-generated)

No editorial review recorded. This historical SI verdict was machine-generated by software and predates the review desk; check it against the official bill text.

Synthesis

The bill is constitutional only if it is narrowly tailored to data centers substantially affecting interstate commerce and does not exceed the enumerated powers of Congress under the Commerce Clause and Necessary and Proper Clause.

Hamilton YES

The proposed legislation requiring disclosure of data center resource usage falls within the Commerce Clause power of Congress to regulate interstate commerce. Data centers are integral to modern interstate and international commerce, and their resource consumption directly affects the national energy grid and economic productivity. Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 grants Congress authority to regulate commerce among the several states, and this disclosure requirement is a necessary and proper means to ensure the stability and efficiency of that commerce. Furthermore, the Necessary and Proper Cl…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 Article I, Section 8, Clause 18 Federalist No. 23
Jefferson NO

This bill, by compelling disclosure of resource usage by data centers, exceeds the limited and enumerated powers delegated to the federal government. The Constitution grants Congress no general authority to mandate such disclosures; the Commerce Clause (Article I, Section 8, Clause 3) cannot be stretched to cover every local activity that may have some remote connection to interstate commerce. Such an exercise of power would invade the reserved rights of the states and the people under the Tenth Amendment. The proper remedy for any perceived need for resource transparency lies with the states,…

Amendment X Article I, Section 8, Clause 3
Madison CONDITIONAL

This bill, requiring disclosure of data center resource usage, may be constitutional if it falls within the enumerated power of Congress to regulate interstate commerce under Article I, Section 8, Clause 3. However, the Constitution does not grant a general police power to the federal government; any such regulation must be tied to a legitimate commercial nexus. If the bill merely mandates information collection without a clear connection to interstate commerce or another enumerated power, it risks exceeding the limited authority delegated by the states. The principle of federalism, as defende…

Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 Federalist No. 45
Marshall CONDITIONAL

This bill, requiring disclosure of data center resource usage, must be examined under the Commerce Clause and the Necessary and Proper Clause. Congress may regulate interstate commerce, and data centers, as instruments of interstate commerce, fall within that sphere. However, the bill's requirement to disclose proprietary resource information may intrude upon state police powers or private property rights if not carefully tailored. Under McCulloch v. Maryland, Congress may employ means that are 'necessary and proper' to execute its enumerated powers, but such means must be consistent with the …

Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 (Commerce Clause) McCulloch v. Maryland (1819)
Report an error in this Founders' Verdict
No account needed. Or email hello@valuesforamerica.com. How reports are handled.

What should pass

“VFA SI Solution”

No solution yet

A sourced SI draft appears here once it passes automated checks (Constitution citation, source verification, independent SI critic). How publication works.

Share card

1200×675 PNG for X, Threads, LinkedIn and messages. Free to share with a link back to this page.

For journalists and bloggers

“Embed this grade”

Free to use with the link back. The badge and card update when the grade changes. Embed terms →

VFA Constitution grade for H.R. 10005

← Back to the Republic