Values for America · Brief for congressional offices
To the office of U.S. Senator Ruben Gallego
Children's Account Safety and Parental Consent Act of 2025
The measure, as described from the official record: Require social media platforms to obtain verified parental consent before children under 18 (or a defined age) can create or maintain accounts, to protect minors from online harms such as data exploitation, exposure to inappropriate content, and predatory behavior.
The proposal
Operative provisions (VFA proposal)
- funding source
- A one-time appropriation of $10 million from the Federal Trade Commission's existing Salaries and Expenses account, offset by a 0.25% annual fee on social media platforms' gross U.S. revenue exceeding $100 million.
- funding amount
- $10 million for initial rulemaking and enforcement, with ongoing costs covered by the fee mechanism (estimated $5 million annually).
- sunset years
- 5 years
- oversight body
- Federal Trade Commission, Bureau of Consumer Protection, with annual reporting to the Senate Committee on Commerce, Science, and Transportation and the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.
- enforcement mechanism
- Civil actions by the FTC in federal district court for injunctive relief and civil penalties; no private right of action. Courts may consider the platform's good-faith compliance with FTC guidance.
- effective date
- 180 days after enactment, or upon issuance of the final rule, whichever is later.
Constitutional basis
- Article I, Section 8, Clause 3 (Commerce Clause – regulation of interstate commercial social media platforms)
- First Amendment (rights of minors and platforms protected by savings clause)
- Tenth Amendment (no commandeering of states; state laws with greater protections preserved)
- Fifth Amendment Due Process (clear definitions and FTC rulemaking ensure notice and fair enforcement)
Concerns with the measure as written:
- First Amendment – the bill may restrict minors' rights to receive and express information, and burden platforms' editorial discretion without strict scrutiny justification.
- Tenth Amendment – the bill may exceed federal power by regulating purely intrastate social media interactions not substantially affecting interstate commerce.
- Fifth Amendment Due Process – vague definition of 'parental consent' and 'social media platform' could lead to arbitrary enforcement or suppression of lawful speech.
Why both sides can back it (VFA’s assessment)
Democratic priorities honored: Stronger protections for children's privacy and safety online, closing loopholes in COPPA, and federal enforcement preempting weaker state laws. Republican priorities honored: Narrow tailoring to existing COPPA framework and First Amendment savings clause, no new content mandates or speech restrictions, use of existing FTC authority rather than a new agency, fee-based funding that does not rely on general revenue, and a sunset to force re-evaluation.
Values for America is a nonpartisan, constitution-first SI think tank. This brief is informational. It is a policy proposal, not law, and it does not support or oppose any candidate or party. Full analysis and sources: https://www.valuesforamerica.com/solutions/224 · Methodology: https://www.valuesforamerica.com/methodology